New pharmacologic approaches to the prevention of space/motion sickness

Fundamental approaches in selection of new agents for evaluation in prevention of space/motion sickness (SMS) are reviewed. The discussion centers on drugs under investigation at the Johnson Space Center. Methodology that employs the rotating chair for measuring SMS symptomatology and susceptibility is described. The most obvious approach to the development of new agents relies on selection of agents from drug classes that possess pharmacologic properties of established anti-motion sickness agents. A second approach selects drugs that are used to prevent emesis caused by means other than exposure to motion. The third approach relies on basic research that characterizes individual differences in susceptibility. The hypothesis is: detection of individual differences leads to identification of specific drugs, which target physiologic systems that show individual differences. These physiologic systems are targets for therapy and may play a role in the etiology of SMS. Two drugs that reduce susceptibility to SMS include dexamethasone and d(CH2)5Tyr(Me)AVP, a vasopressin (AVP)V1 antagonist. The latter peptide has demonstrated complete blockade of emesis and other significant symptoms in squirrel monkeys. These studies were predicated on observations that subjects who were more resistant to SMS had higher plasma AVP after severe nausea than subjects with lower resistances. Investigations are underway to test a 0.5-mg intravenous dose in humans. Kappa opioid agonists inhibit AVP release and offer new therapeutic possibilities and advantages over AVP peptides. This review details the experimental data collected on AVP and adrenocorticotropin. The literature supports interrelated roles for AVP and opioid peptides in SMS. Experimental testing of kappa agonists is warranted because specific opioid agonists act at neuroanatomical sites causing nausea and vomiting. It is argued opioid receptors in the chemoreceptor trigger zone and vomiting center stimulate and inhibit the emetic response, respectively. The evidence suggests kappa and/or mu receptors at VC are involved in inhibition of emesis, whereas delta opioid receptors at CTZ are involved in stimulation of emesis.