Related Experiment Videos
Why we love quality but hate to measure it
1Institute for Global Health, and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistic and Medicine, University of California-San Francisco, 50 Beale Street, San Francisco, CA 94105, USA.
Abstract:
As a group, physicians strive for quality but often resist quality measurement. Cost, inconvenience, lack of time, mistrust of quality measures, and a fear of what assessment may find are all factors contributing to this resistance. However, quality, in both rich and poor counties, continues to be poor at worse and varied at best. If we are to improve the quality of our care, we need quality measurement to show us our weaknesses. A variety of tools are available to assess quality, which, when followed by the right policy interventions, can lead to improved care. Quality measurements are most effective when they are comparative, reflect the complexity of clinical practice, are not expected to be a panacea for spiraling costs, and are made available to our colleagues and our patients.
Related Concept Videos
Quality Assurance
Statistical Analysis: Overview
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments
Accuracy and Precision
Accuracy and Precision