Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Autonomy and audit--striking the balance.

Lynn Hagger1, Simon Woods, Paul Barrow

  • 1University of Sheffield, UK.

Medical Law International
|April 21, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Identifying and reporting dystocia in laboratory rodents.

Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

The application of bacteriophage to veterinary and One-Health medicine-a road map.

Frontiers in microbiology·2026
Same author

Identification of a Novel Regulatory Gene, <i>trmE,</i> that Orchestrates <i>Salmonella</i> Flagellar Synthesis and Virulence.

Microorganisms·2025
Same author

Review of embryo-fetal developmental toxicity studies performed for pharmaceuticals approved by FDA in 2022 and 2023.

Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.)·2024
Same author

Male premating treatment in FEED studies: Length is not everything.

Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.)·2024
Same author

iPREDICT: proof-of-concept study to develop a predictive model of changes in asthma control.

Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease·2024

The Data Protection Act 1998 impacts individual privacy. This paper examines ethical considerations for using personal data in research and audits, focusing on public interest justifications.

Area of Science:

  • Health Law
  • Information Governance
  • Bioethics

Background:

  • The Data Protection Act 1998 aimed to protect individual privacy by implementing European legislation.
  • Concerns arose regarding the Act's impact on essential research and audit activities, necessitating further legal provisions.
  • Existing legislation allows the Secretary of State for Health to approve specific proposals for data use.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the challenges in justifying the use of identifiable personal information without consent for research and audits.
  • To explore the legal framework governing data protection in research and audit contexts.
  • To emphasize the role of ethical considerations in substantiating public interest arguments for data use.

Main Methods:

  • Legal analysis of the Data Protection Act 1998 and related legislation.
Keywords:
Biomedical and Behavioral ResearchLegal Approach

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of theoretical difficulties in applying data protection principles to audit activities.
  • Ethical review of public interest justifications for data usage.

    • Main Results:

    • The justification for using identifiable personal information without consent can be complex and inconsistently applied.
    • A lack of clear understanding exists regarding the considerations for public interest arguments in data protection.
    • Ethical considerations are crucial for informing and strengthening public interest justifications.

    Conclusions:

    • Navigating the legal framework for data protection in research and audits requires careful consideration of ethical principles.
    • Compelling public interest must be rigorously demonstrated when seeking to use identifiable personal information without consent.
    • A nuanced approach, informed by ethical reflection, is essential for balancing privacy rights with the needs of research and audit.