Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

Immobilization of Multi-biocatalysts in Alginate Beads for Cofactor Regeneration and Improved Reusability
Published on: April 22, 2016
Methods for the preparation of a biodesulfurization biocatalyst using Rhodococcus sp
Cui-Qing Ma1, Jin-Hui Feng, Yi-Yong Zeng
1State Key Lab of Microbial Technology of Shandong University, Jinan 250100, PR China.
This study explored cost-effective biodesulfurization (BDS) biocatalyst preparation using Rhodococcus sp. 1awq. A mixed sulfur source method yielded a biocatalyst that efficiently removed 78% of sulfur from HDS-treated diesel oil.
Area of Science:
- Biotechnology
- Environmental Science
- Microbial Chemistry
Background:
- Biodesulfurization (BDS) offers a promising alternative to conventional hydrodesulfurization (HDS).
- Optimizing biocatalyst production is crucial for the economic viability of BDS processes.
- Rhodococcus sp. 1awq utilizes the "4S" pathway for selective sulfur removal from organosulfur compounds like dibenzothiophene (DBT).
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate various methods for preparing a cost-effective biodesulfurization (BDS) biocatalyst using Rhodococcus sp. 1awq.
- To evaluate the influence of different sulfur sources (DBT, DMSO, sodium sulfate, mixed sources) on biocatalyst performance.
- To determine the optimal conditions for maximizing desulfurization activity and minimizing production costs.
Main Methods:
- Cultivation of Rhodococcus sp. 1awq using different sole sulfur sources (DBT, DMSO, inorganic sulfur) and mixed sulfur sources.
- Assessment of cell density, desulfurization activity, and desulfurization ability under varying conditions.
- Evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of biocatalyst production methods.
- Application of the prepared biocatalyst to hydrodesulfurization (HDS)-treated diesel oil.
Main Results:
- Cultivation in inorganic sulfur induced only partial desulfurization activity compared to DBT.
- Biocatalyst prepared with mixed sulfur sources exhibited significant desulfurization activity.
- Desulfurization activity using DMSO as the sole sulfur source was comparable to using DBT.
- The biocatalyst produced using mixed sulfur sources, at the lowest cost, achieved 78% total sulfur removal from HDS-treated diesel oil.
Conclusions:
- Mixed sulfur sources provide an effective and cost-efficient method for preparing BDS biocatalysts from Rhodococcus sp. 1awq.
- The developed BDS biocatalyst demonstrates high efficiency in removing sulfur from HDS-treated diesel oil.
- This approach offers a sustainable and economically advantageous solution for cleaner fuel production.
More Related Videos
15:19Development of Sulfidogenic Sludge from Marine Sediments and Trichloroethylene Reduction in an Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket Reactor
Published on: October 15, 2015
08:30A Complete Method for Evaluating the Performance of Photocatalysts for the Degradation of Antibiotics in Environmental Remediation
Published on: October 6, 2022