Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Two-stage designs in case-control association analysis.

Yijun Zuo1, Guohua Zou, Hongyu Zhao

  • 1Department of Statistics and Probability, Michigan State University, Michigan 48824, USA.

Genetics
|April 21, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A bacterial ally for nitrogen-fixing biofilm: enhancing the rhizosphere colonization of <i>Stutzerimonas stutzeri</i> A1501 with surfactin-producing <i>Bacillus velezensis</i> BRI3.

Applied and environmental microbiology·2026
Same author

Electro-driven aerobic biological nitrogen fixation for protein and ammonium production by Azotobacter vinelandii with sucrose as the sole carbon source.

Bioresource technology·2026
Same author

Complete genome sequence of <i>Bradyrhizobium japonicum</i> ACCC 15027.

Microbiology resource announcements·2025
Same author

Optimal prevention and control strategy of infectious disease: Cost-effectiveness analysis based on a modified dynamic model with economic loss.

Infectious Disease Modelling·2025
Same author

Differential Expression Characteristics of Two Isoforms <i>nr5a2f</i> and <i>nr5a2m</i> in Gonadal Differentiation of Chinese Giant Salamanders, <i>Andrias davidianus</i>.

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI·2025
Same author

Robust model averaging approach by Mallows-type criterion.

Biometrics·2024
Same journal

Adaptive Dynamics of Quantitative Traits in a Steadily Changing Environment.

Genetics·2026
Same journal

Functional Landscape of Zebrafish Gonadotropins and Receptors: A Comprehensive Genetic Analysis.

Genetics·2026
Same journal

Synergistic actions of Nup43 and Myosin VI drive actin cone assembly during Drosophila spermiogenesis.

Genetics·2026
Same journal

Identification of two Cryptococcus neoformans heme transporters involved in Fhb1-mediated nitrosative stress protection in a fission yeast model.

Genetics·2026
Same journal

Analysis of a hypomorphic mei-P26 mutation reveals coordination between developmental programming of germ cells and meiotic chromosome dynamics.

Genetics·2026
Same journal

Neural and Genetic Mechanisms Regulating Copulation Latency in Male Drosophila melanogaster.

Genetics·2026
See all related articles

DNA pooling in genetic studies offers a cost-effective two-stage screening approach. This method efficiently identifies disease-associated markers for further analysis, even with non-negligible measurement errors.

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Statistical genetics
  • Genomics

Background:

  • DNA pooling is a cost-effective method for assessing marker allele frequencies in genetic studies.
  • It is commonly used as a preliminary screening tool to select candidate markers for subsequent individual genotyping.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate statistical properties and design considerations for two-stage DNA pooling.
  • Evaluate marker selection, statistical power, and ranking of disease-associated markers in the second stage.

Main Methods:

  • Derived analytical results for marker selection proportions in two-stage designs.
  • Assessed the impact of measurement errors on statistical power and marker ranking.
  • Analyzed the probability of identifying true disease-associated markers.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Suggests selecting approximately 3% of markers for the second stage with small measurement errors (0.005) and an allele frequency difference of 0.05.
  • Measurement errors in DNA pooling have minimal effect on statistical power, unlike in one-stage designs.
  • High probability of ranking at least one disease-associated marker among the top in the second stage, even with larger errors.

Conclusions:

  • The two-stage DNA pooling design is an efficient screening strategy for genomewide association studies.
  • The approach remains effective even with non-negligible measurement errors.
  • Statistical outcomes depend on population allele frequency and allele frequency differences between cases and controls.