Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Clinical decision rules in radiology.

Martin H Reed1

  • 1Department of Radiology, University of Manitoba, The Children's Hospital, 840 Sherbrook Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3A 1S1. mreed@hsc.mb.ca

Academic Radiology
|April 22, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Challenge of Diversity in Radiology.

Academic radiology·2023
Same author

Controversy and debate: challenges with the need to improve the reference standard in diagnosis paper 1: two challenges: absence of a clear cut, easily replicable test for the reference standard; unethical/infeasible inclusion of an invasive procedure in the reference standard.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2022
Same author

Challenges with need to improve the reference standard in diagnosis: paper 3: response to mustafa and schunemann.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2022
Same author

Classifications of split hand foot malformation (SHFM) should include transverse deficiencies: Why Maisels was correct.

American journal of medical genetics. Part A·2021
Same author

Diagnostic Imaging Referral Guidelines: Where Are We Now?

Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes·2019
Same author

The Canadian Association of Radiologists Referral Guidelines.

Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes·2018
Same journal

Deep Learning for Opportunistic Vertebral Fracture Detection on Routine Thoraco-abdominal Computed Tomography: A Systematic Review and Hierarchical Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic Meta-analysis of Patient-level Diagnostic Test Accuracy.

Academic radiology·2026
Same journal

"Where are They Now?": A Single Institution's 10-Years Experience with an Integrated Nuclear Radiology Fellowship.

Academic radiology·2026
Same journal

Dual-layer Spectral Detector CT Quantitative Parameters for Predicting Tumor Budding Grade and Prognosis in Stage Ⅱ Colorectal Cancer.

Academic radiology·2026
Same journal

Promotion from Associate Professor to Full Professor Should Not Be Monolithic: A National Bibliometric Study by Radiology Subspecialty.

Academic radiology·2026
Same journal

Technological Lag of Digitization for Patient Image Transfer.

Academic radiology·2026
Same journal

Prognostic Value of Coronary Sinus Flow and Aortic Pressure Gradient Quantified by 4D Flow CMR in AMI.

Academic radiology·2026
See all related articles

Developing evidence-based clinical decision rules is crucial for appropriate diagnostic imaging use. These rules help control overutilization and improve patient outcomes by defining when imaging studies are most valuable.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Health Policy
  • Clinical Decision-Making

Background:

  • Overutilization of diagnostic imaging studies necessitates evidence-based clinical decision rules.
  • Current practices require guidance to ensure appropriate and effective use of imaging technologies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline methods for developing evidence-based clinical decision rules for diagnostic imaging.
  • To address the need for controlled utilization of imaging studies in clinical practice.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing Fryback and Thornbury's hierarchical model of efficacy to assess imaging value.
  • Designing randomized control trials to evaluate patient outcomes and societal efficacies (levels five and six).
  • Employing systematic literature reviews and decision tree analysis for evidence synthesis.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Diagnostic imaging efficacy is often best assessed at levels of diagnostic thinking and therapeutic impact (levels three and four).
  • Studies can identify clinical scenarios where imaging provides no benefit or establish criteria for its use.
  • Evidence synthesis methods can inform the creation of robust clinical decision rules.

Conclusions:

  • Evidence-based clinical decision rules are essential for optimizing diagnostic imaging utilization.
  • A multi-level approach to efficacy assessment, including patient outcomes and clinical utility, is recommended.
  • Systematic reviews and decision analysis are key tools for developing these critical guidelines.