Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 29, 2026

Biventricular Assessment of Cardiac Function and Pressure-Volume Loops by Closed-Chest Catheterization in Mice
Published on: June 15, 2020
Volume measurement by CARTO compared with cardiac magnetic resonance
F Grothues1, O Wolfram, C Fantoni
1Department of Cardiology, Otto-von-Guericke-University Leipziger Strasse 44, D-39120 Magdeburg, Germany. frank.grothues@medizin.uni-magdeburg.de
Insights
Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and CARTO electrophysiological mapping show good correlation for ventricular volumes in heart failure patients. However, the methods are not interchangeable for clinical use, especially for right ventricular volumes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
- Electrophysiology
Background:
- The CARTO electrophysiological mapping system is validated for ventricular volume assessment in non-human models.
- Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is the gold standard for non-invasive ventricular volume quantification.
- No direct comparison between CARTO and CMR for ventricular volumes in humans existed.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare CARTO electrophysiological mapping system-derived ventricular volumes with CMR in heart failure patients.
- To assess the correlation and interchangeability of these two imaging modalities for volumetric analysis.
Main Methods:
- 34 heart failure patients (NYHA class III/IV) underwent both CARTO mapping and CMR for ventricular volume measurements.
- Left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) end-diastolic volumes (EDV) were measured using both techniques.
- Statistical analysis included correlation and Bland-Altman analysis to assess agreement.
Main Results:
- Mean LV end-diastolic volumes were comparable between CMR and CARTO (P = NS).
- CARTO system measured significantly larger RV end-diastolic volumes compared to CMR (P < 0.01).
- A good correlation was observed for both chambers, but Bland-Altman analysis indicated non-interchangeability; differences were influenced by mapping point density.
Conclusions:
- While CARTO and CMR show good correlation for LVEDV and RVEDV in heart failure patients, their clinical interchangeability is questionable.
- The number of acquired mapping points impacts measurement accuracy, suggesting potential limitations for CARTO in precise volumetric assessment.
- Further research may be needed to refine CARTO protocols for improved volumetric accuracy and interchangeability with CMR.
Aims:
The CARTO electrophysiological mapping system has demonstrated accurate results for end-diastolic ventricular volumes in casts and animals. However, in humans, a comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), the non-invasive gold standard for volumetric analysis, has not yet been performed.
Methods And Results:
A total of 34 (29 male) heart failure patients (NYHA class III/IV) underwent an electrophysiological mapping procedure with the CARTO system in the left ventricle (LV) (n = 34) and right ventricle (RV) (n = 12) and CMR for RV and LV end-diastolic volume (RVEDV and LVEDV) measurements another day. Mean LVEDV was comparable between CMR and CARTO (328 +/- 95 and 320 +/- 92 mL, respectively; P = NS), whereas RV volumes measured by CARTO were larger (CMR 140 +/- 48 vs. CARTO 176 +/- 47 mL; P < 0.01). Overall, we found a good correlation between CMR and CARTO measurements for both chambers; however, the Bland-Altman analysis showed a non-interchangeability of these methods. Measurement differences were independent of chamber size, but significantly affected by the number of acquired mapping points.
Conclusion:
Although CMR and CARTO showed a good correlation in the measurement of RVEDV and LVEDV in a group of heart failure patients, the clinical interchangeability of the two methods may be questioned.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System I:Echocardiography
Indications: Echocardiography is utilized to diagnose heart failure, valve disorders, and myocardial infarction. It also assesses cardiac structures' size, shape, and motion, evaluates...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT

