Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

Development of a Benchtop Model for Evaluating the Compatibility of Wound Dressing Materials with Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Systems
Published on: May 2, 2025
Complications of adapting pressure ulcer risk assessment scales
1Tissue Viability, Oxford Radcliffe NHS Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, UK.
Abstract:
This article challenges recommendations to adapt a pressure ulcer risk assessment scale (RAS) according to the clinical context. The transformation of the Cubbin and Jackson (1991) RAS is used to illustrate problems in scale development. When new factors are added to an existing scale, this can lead to unnecessary complexity. When words are changed by a person developing a scale this illustrates their differing beliefs and value judgements. Arbitrary scores for factors are misleading and in some cases mystifying, yet appear to be objective. This article suggests that the relationship between sub-scales and the whole scale have not been adequately accounted for -- they can't simply be added up arithmetically. The paradox of risk is debated, namely, that the more something is thought to be a risk, the less risky it becomes. RASs should be replaced by risk reduction scales linking a risk factor with its outcome following intervention.
Related Concept Videos
Healing II: Complications
Peripheral Artery Disease IV: Nursing Management
Diabetic Foot Ulcer
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System III: Palpation
Jugular Venous Pressure (JVP) Measurement
Position the patient at a thirty- to forty-five-degree angle or in a semi-fowler's position. Look for the highest point of pulsation in the internal jugular vein and measure the vertical distance to the angle of Loius or sternal angle. A normal JVP is 3-4 cm above the...
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management