Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 1, 2026

09:46
Accessing the Cytotoxicity and Cell Response to Biomaterials
Published on: July 8, 2021
In vitro and in vivo (cyto)toxicity assays using PVC and LDPE as model materials
E A E Van Tienhoven1, D Korbee, L Schipper
1Centre for Biological Medicines and Medical Technology, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, P.O. Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, the Netherlands. esther.van.tienhoven@rivm.nl
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part A
|April 22, 2006
Summary
Evaluating biomaterial cytotoxicity requires careful assay selection. Mice are superior to rats for detecting local toxic responses in vivo, while in vitro direct contact assays offer limited additional data.
Area of Science:
- Biomaterials Science
- Toxicology
- Cell Biology
Background:
- Biomaterial selection relies on cytotoxicity assays.
- Understanding assay parameters is crucial for accurate results.
- Standardized testing protocols are needed for reliable biomaterial evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the rationales behind selecting parameters for cytotoxicity assays.
- To compare in vitro and in vivo assay performance.
- To determine the optimal animal model for local toxicity assessment.
Main Methods:
- Cytotoxicity was assessed using in vitro direct contact and extraction assays with human epidermal keratinocytes and mouse fibroblasts/epithelial cells.
- Cell survival was measured via the tetrazolium salt (MTT) reduction assay.
- Local implantation studies were conducted in mice and rats using positive, negative, and experimental toxicity samples.
Main Results:
- Positive controls showed high in vitro toxicity, confirming extraction of toxic components.
- Direct contact assays with negative controls significantly reduced mouse fibroblast survival.
- In vivo studies revealed severe degeneration in mice with positive controls, while rats showed minimal changes.
- Experimental materials induced moderate responses in mice only.
- Mice were more sensitive than rats in detecting local toxic responses in vivo.
Conclusions:
- The direct contact assay provides limited additional cytotoxicity information without considering specific limitations.
- Mice are more suitable than rats for in vivo local toxicity detection.
- Careful selection of assay parameters and animal models is essential for accurate biomaterial safety assessment.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
In Vitro Drug Dissolution: Compendial Testing Models II
Various dissolution methods are utilized to assess a drug’s dissolution rate, including the flow-through cell, paddle-over-disk, cylinder, and reciprocating disk methods.The flow-through cell apparatus (USP (United States Pharmacopeia) method 4) comprises a reservoir for the dissolution medium and a pump that propels the medium through the cell containing the test sample. This method is crucial for assessing modified-release dosage forms with minimally soluble active ingredients, maintaining...
Toxicity Testing in Animals
Toxicity tests in animals are grounded on two main assumptions: first, the effects observed in laboratory animals can be extrapolated to humans, especially when adjusted for body surface area; second, high-dose exposure in animals is essential to identify potential human hazards from lower doses. This is based on the quantal dose-response concept, which faces the challenge of extrapolating results from relatively few test animals to much larger human populations. For example, a 0.01% incidence...

