Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparison of four scoring methods for the reading span test.

Naomi P Friedman1, Akira Miyake

  • 1Institute for Behavioral Genetics, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA. naomi.friedman@colorado.edu

Behavior Research Methods
|April 25, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Digital phenotyping of affect and stress in emerging adults.

Frontiers in digital health·2026
Same author

Genetic and Environmental Associations Between Processing Speed and Executive Functions Across Adolescence and Established Adulthood.

Behavior genetics·2026
Same author

Pyrrhotite-driven early-stage terrestrial alteration in Ryugu grains.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Cognitive dispersion in established adulthood: etiology and implications for cognitive aging.

Innovation in aging·2026
Same author

Adolescent music engagement is associated with less alcohol consumption and substance experimentation 5-11 years later: A genetically informative study.

Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors·2026
Same author

Relationships Between Polygenic Scores for Psychopathology and Observed Psychopathology Are Mediated by Cognitive Control and Reward Sensitivity Pathways: Insights From the ABCD Study.

Biological psychiatry global open science·2026

Continuous scoring methods for working memory span tasks, like the reading span test, offer better reliability and predictive power than traditional span scores. Avoid dividing participants into high-span and low-span groups for more accurate results.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychometrics

Background:

  • Working memory span tasks are crucial for assessing cognitive abilities.
  • Daneman and Carpenter's (1980) reading span test is a widely used measure.
  • Varied scoring methods exist, potentially impacting results.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the psychometric properties of four scoring methods for the reading span test.
  • To determine the most reliable and valid scoring approach for working memory span tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Compared continuous scoring (total words recalled, proportion of words per set) with traditional span scores (highest set size, words in correct sets).
  • Assessed reliability and correlations with criterion measures (reading comprehension, Verbal SAT).
  • Evaluated the impact of dichotomizing participants into high-span and low-span groups.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Continuous measures demonstrated better normal distribution, higher reliability, and stronger correlations with criterion measures.
  • Traditional span scores and arbitrary group dichotomization showed lower reliability and predictive power.
  • Post hoc dichotomization significantly reduced the predictive validity of span scores.

Conclusions:

  • Continuous scoring methods are recommended for assessing working memory span.
  • Researchers should avoid dichotomizing span task data into arbitrary groups.
  • Using continuous measures enhances the reliability and validity of working memory research.