Iron chelators: correlation between effects on Plasmodium spp. and immune functions

Jacob Golenser1, Abraham Domb, Talya Mordechai-Daniel

  • 1Department of Parasitology-The Kuvin Center for the Research of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel. golenser@md.huji.ac.il

Insights

Iron chelators show in vitro efficacy against malaria parasites but limited human protection. In vivo studies revealed that immune modulation, not just direct parasite killing, influences malaria recovery, suggesting a need to evaluate immune interactions for drug development.

Area of Science:

  • Immunology and Infectious Diseases
  • Pharmacology and Drug Development

Background:

  • Iron chelating agents demonstrate in vitro effectiveness against Plasmodium falciparum.
  • However, their therapeutic effect in human malaria is often transient and incomplete.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the in vitro and in vivo antiplasmodial efficacy of novel iron chelators (MoB) compared to established agents (DFO, SIH; together DoS).
  • To investigate the impact of these iron chelators on immune cell proliferation, cytokine production, and radical scavenging.

Main Methods:

  • In vitro assessment of iron chelators against Plasmodium falciparum.
  • In vivo malaria model using Plasmodium vinckei-infected mice treated with iron chelators.
  • Analysis of B cell and T cell proliferation, mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR), and immune mediator (IL-10, gamma-IFN, TNF-alpha, radicals) production.

Main Results:

  • MoB showed superior in vitro antiplasmodial activity compared to DoS.
  • In vivo, DoS-treated mice survived Plasmodium vinckei infection, while MoB-treated mice succumbed, despite similar pharmacokinetics.
  • Iron chelators broadly inhibited immune cell proliferation; DoS modulated cytokine profiles (decreased IL-10, increased gamma-IFN, TNF-alpha) correlating with survival, while MoB did not.

Conclusions:

  • In vivo efficacy of iron chelators is influenced by their immunomodulatory effects, not solely direct antiplasmodial activity.
  • Drugs that inhibit crucial protective immune responses, like MoB, may fail in vivo despite potent in vitro activity.
  • Future antiparasitic drug development should consider immune system interactions to ensure therapeutic success and avoid detrimental effects.

Related Concept Videos

Antiprotozoal Agents01:21

Antiprotozoal Agents

Leishmaniasis is a widespread parasitic disease caused by several Leishmania species. It affects millions of people each year and remains a major public health problem in endemic regions. First-line treatment relies on pentavalent antimonials, including meglumine antimoniate and sodium stibogluconate. Even so, how these drugs work has not been fully clear, especially their interaction with parasite-specific biochemical pathways. One key target is trypanothione reductase (TR), an enzyme that...
Malaria01:29

Malaria

Malaria pathogenesis in humans reflects a delicate interplay between parasite biology and host response. Clinical illness reflects a host’s immune response to the parasite’s asexual replication cycle, which is often asymptomatic in individuals with partial immunity. From the parasite's perspective, transmission between mosquito and human with minimal host pathology is evolutionarily advantageous. Among the six Plasmodium species infecting humans, P. falciparum and P. vivax dominate in global...
Anthelminthic Agents01:15

Anthelminthic Agents

Anthelmintic drugs differ significantly from antiparasitic therapies targeting protozoa, primarily due to differences in parasite biology. Whereas most protozoal treatments act on proliferating cells, anthelmintics are typically directed against mature, nonproliferative helminths. The therapeutic approach considers the helminth's reliance on neuromuscular coordination, glucose metabolism, and microtubular integrity for survival, reproduction, and localization within the host. Most anthelmintics...
Antimicrobial Proteins01:23

Antimicrobial Proteins

Antimicrobial proteins are important components of the immune system. They aid the body in combating pathogens by either killing them directly or hindering their replication processes. Four main types of antimicrobial substances are interferons, the complement system, iron-binding proteins, and antimicrobial proteins.
Interferons
Interferons (IFNs) are proteins produced by lymphocytes, macrophages, and fibroblasts infected with viruses. While IFNs cannot prevent viruses from entering and...
Diversity of Protists II01:27

Diversity of Protists II

Alveolates are a group of organisms recognized by the presence of alveoli, which are cytoplasmic sacs located beneath the cell membrane. While their function remains uncertain, alveoli may help regulate water balance by controlling how much water enters and leaves the cell. In dinoflagellates, these structures may serve as armor plates. There are three major types of alveolates: ciliates, which move using cilia; dinoflagellates, which use flagella for movement; and apicomplexans, which are...