Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Acoustic measurement: a tutorial for molecular biologists.

Rickie R Davis1

  • 1Hearing Loss Prevention Team, Engineering and Physical Hazards Branch, Division of Applied Research and Technology, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 4676 Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, OH 45226, USA. rrd1@cdc.gov

Brain Research
|April 25, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Impulsive noise: A brief review.

Hearing research·2016
Same author

Letter to the Editor: Scientific Rigor Required for a Re-Examination of Exchange Rate for Occupational Noise Measurements Re: Dobie, R.A., & Clark, W.W. (2014) Exchange Rates for Intermittent and Fluctuating Occupational Noise: A Systematic Review of Studies of Human Permanent Threshold Shift, Ear Hear, 35, 86-96.

Ear and hearing·2015
Same author

Early prognosis of noise-induced hearing loss: prioritising prevention over prediction.

Occupational and environmental medicine·2014
Same author

Noise exposure immediately activates cochlear mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling.

Noise & health·2014
Same author

Do hearing protectors protect hearing?

American journal of industrial medicine·2014
Same author

Acceptance of a semi-custom hearing protector by manufacturing workers.

Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene·2011
Same journal

IGFBP3 and UBE2C are associated with protein modification pathways and serve as prognostic markers in glioma.

Brain research·2026
Same journal

Targeting neurodevelopmental miR132-3p promotes neuroprotection and axon regeneration after optic nerve injury in mice.

Brain research·2026
Same journal

Variability in acoustic startle response and prepulse inhibition across adulthood in Fragile X messenger ribonucleoprotein 1 knockout mice.

Brain research·2026
Same journal

Transcriptome-guided modeling reveals insulin-related metabolic dysfunction in SCA3 mouse cerebellum.

Brain research·2026
Same journal

Intranasal stromal cell-derived factor-1α mitigates parkinsonian deficits via dual modulation of neuroinflammation and gut microbiota in MPTP-induced models.

Brain research·2026
Same journal

Emotions, the amygdala, and the right hemisphere.

Brain research·2026
See all related articles

Molecular biologists need guidance on acoustical measurement for auditory brainstem response (ABR) and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) testing. This article provides practical guidelines and resources for accurate acoustic stimulus measurement in well-equipped labs.

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Acoustics
  • Molecular Biology

Background:

  • Molecular biologists often lack expertise in precise acoustical measurement.
  • Accurate acoustic measurement is crucial for auditory system function assessment, including Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) and Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions (DPOAE).
  • Noise exposure challenges necessitate reliable acoustic measurement protocols.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide practical guidelines for acoustical measurement of stimuli.
  • To bridge the knowledge gap for molecular biologists regarding acoustic measurement techniques.
  • To offer resources for equipment procurement and further information.

Main Methods:

  • The article outlines theoretical principles of acoustic signal measurement using calibrated microphones.

Related Experiment Videos

  • It details practical considerations and potential complexities in real-world acoustic measurements.
  • Guidelines are presented for implementation in a standard laboratory setting.

    • Main Results:

    • The study provides a framework for conducting accurate acoustic measurements relevant to auditory evoked potentials and emissions.
    • It simplifies complex acoustical measurement concepts for non-specialists.
    • Links to further resources and equipment suppliers are compiled.

    Conclusions:

    • Molecular biologists can perform reliable acoustic stimulus measurements with appropriate guidelines.
    • This work facilitates more accurate auditory function testing and noise exposure research.
    • Accessible resources empower laboratories to conduct precise acoustical measurements.