Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Angularly nonspecific response suppression in rat barrel cortex.

Vivek Khatri1, Daniel J Simons

  • 1Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.

Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)
|April 25, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Compartment-specific transcriptome of motor neurons reveals impaired extracellular matrix signaling and activated cell cycle kinases in FUS-ALS.

Neurobiology of disease·2026
Same author

Overconfidence Persists Despite Years of Accurate, Precise, Public, and Continuous Feedback: Two Studies of Tournament Chess Players.

Psychological science·2025
Same author

Axonal transcriptome reveals upregulation of PLK1 as a protective mechanism in response to increased DNA damage in FUS <sup>P525L</sup> spinal motor neurons.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2024
Same author

Predicting Vasospasm and Early Mortality in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Model Using Serum Cytokines, Neuronal Proteins, and Clinical Data.

Neurosurgery·2024
Same author

Subjective evidence evaluation survey for many-analysts studies.

Royal Society open science·2024
Same author

Inattentional blindness in medicine.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2024
Same journal

Differentiation of cortical areas: effects of free energy minimization with broken symmetry.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026
Same journal

Prior exposure to speech rapidly modulates cortical processing of high-level linguistic structure.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026
Same journal

Beta bursts in SMA mediate anticipatory muscle inhibition.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026
Same journal

Cognitive load modulates the effects of social contexts on facial expression processing.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026
Same journal

The neural mechanisms of aligning spatial perspectives.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026
Same journal

Relationships between bilateral tapping skills and brain gray matter volumes: a voxel-based morphometry study.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026
See all related articles

Prior whisker deflection adaptation largely suppresses responses in barrel cortex neurons regardless of stimulus angle. This nonspecific suppression sharpens neural tuning, suggesting local circuit interactions rather than thalamic input changes.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Sensory processing
  • Somatosensation

Background:

  • Neuronal responses are modulated by prior sensory stimulation.
  • Understanding stimulus specificity in adaptation reveals circuitry properties.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate how whisker deflection angle affects adaptation in barrel cortex neurons.
  • Examine adaptation effects on both regular-spike units (RSUs) and fast-spike units (FSUs).

Main Methods:

  • Recorded responses of thalamic barreloid and layer IV barrel neurons to whisker deflections.
  • Applied adapting whisker deflections at various angles before testing responses.

Main Results:

  • Prior whisker deflection suppressed responses to subsequent deflections of all angles (angularly nonspecific).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Fast-spike units (FSUs) showed poor angular tuning, which persisted after adaptation.
  • Adapted regular-spike units (RSUs) showed sharpened tuning due to greater suppression of suboptimal responses.
  • Adaptation effects in barrel neurons did not mirror changes in thalamic inputs.

    • Conclusions:

    • Angularly nonspecific suppression in barrel neurons likely results from local inhibitory interactions or synaptic depression.
    • The findings suggest barrel neurons interact non-specifically, reinforcing thalamic input preferences.