Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Biological effects of aspirin and clopidogrel in a randomized cross-over study in 96 healthy volunteers
1Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Division of Angiology and Hemostasis, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. pierre.fontana@medecine.unige.ch
Insights
True aspirin resistance is rare in healthy individuals. Aspirin pseudo-resistance, a common finding, does not impact clopidogrel responsiveness, suggesting distinct mechanisms for antiplatelet drug efficacy.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacology
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Clinical Investigation
Background:
- Emerging data suggest that biological resistance to antiplatelet agents like aspirin and clopidogrel may impact patient outcomes.
- Understanding individual responses to these critical medications is essential for optimizing cardiovascular disease management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between aspirin and clopidogrel responsiveness in healthy subjects.
- To differentiate between true aspirin resistance and pseudo-resistance and assess their impact on clopidogrel response.
Main Methods:
- A randomized crossover study involving 96 healthy subjects.
- Administration of aspirin (100 mg/day) and clopidogrel (300 mg loading, 75 mg maintenance) in sequential or reverse order, with a washout period.
- Assessment of drug effects using serum Thromboxane B2 (TxB2) assay, platelet aggregation tests, and Platelet Function Analyzer (PFA-100) and VerifyNow assays.
Main Results:
- True aspirin resistance, defined by elevated TxB2 levels and confirmed ex vivo, was observed in only one subject.
- A significant proportion (29%) of subjects exhibited aspirin pseudo-resistance (normal PFA-100 despite reduced TxB2), which was not associated with altered clopidogrel responsiveness.
- No association was found between common platelet receptor gene polymorphisms and responsiveness to either aspirin or clopidogrel.
Conclusions:
- True aspirin resistance is infrequent in the healthy population.
- Aspirin pseudo-resistance is a distinct phenomenon not linked to clopidogrel responsiveness in healthy individuals.
- These findings highlight the rarity of true aspirin resistance and the lack of cross-reactivity with clopidogrel response in healthy subjects.
Background:
Some data suggest that biological 'resistance' to aspirin or clopidogrel may influence clinical outcome.
Objective:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between aspirin and clopidogrel responsiveness in healthy subjects.
Methods:
Ninety-six healthy subjects were randomly assigned to receive a 1-week course of aspirin 100 mg day(-1) followed by a 1-week course of clopidogrel (300 mg on day 1, then 75 mg day(-1)), or the reverse sequence, separated by a 2-week wash-out period. The drug effects were assessed by means of serum TxB2 assay, platelet aggregation tests, and the PFA -100 and Ultegra RPFA -Verify Now methods.
Results:
Only one subject had true aspirin resistance, defined as a serum TxB2 level > 80 pg microL(-1) at the end of aspirin administration and confirmed by platelet incubation with aspirin. PFA-100 values were normal in 29% of the subjects after aspirin intake, despite a drastic reduction in TxB2 production; these subjects were considered to have aspirin pseudo-resistance. Clopidogrel responsiveness was not related to aspirin pseudo-resistance. Selected polymorphisms of platelet receptor genes were not associated with either aspirin or clopidogrel responsiveness.
Conclusions:
In healthy subjects, true aspirin resistance is rare and aspirin pseudo-resistance is not related to clopidogrel responsiveness.
Related Concept Videos
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Pharmacogenetic Phenotypes: Alterations in Pharmacokinetics, Drug Targets and Biologic Milieu