Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Anesthesiologist-controlled versus patient-controlled propofol sedation for shockwave lithotripsy.

Jamal A Alhashemi1, Abdullah M Kaki

  • 1Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, P.O. Box 31648, Jeddah 21418, Saudi Arabia. jalhashemi@kau.edu.sa

Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia = Journal Canadien D'Anesthesie
|April 26, 2006
PubMed
Summary

Anesthesiologist-controlled sedation (ACS) provided deeper sedation and greater comfort during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy but required more propofol and resulted in slower recovery compared to patient-controlled sedation (PCS).

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Non-adherence to Clinical Practice Guidelines in Regional Anesthesia and Pain Interventions: Insights From a Comprehensive Case Series Review.

Cureus·2025
Same author

Neuronal plasticity and its role in Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease.

Neural regeneration research·2024
Same author

Assessing the Burden of Osteoarthritis in Africa and the Middle East: A Rapid Evidence Assessment.

Open access rheumatology : research and reviews·2023
Same author

Pain Management in the Post-COVID Era-An Update: A Narrative Review.

Pain and therapy·2023
Same author

Efficacy of bupivacaine injection after pulsed radiofrequency ablation in the management of trigeminal facial pain: A prospective, randomized, and double-blind study.

Saudi medical journal·2022
Same author

Post-amputation pain among lower limb amputees in a tertiary care hospital in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: A retrospective study.

Saudi medical journal·2022

Area of Science:

  • Anesthesiology
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Sedation is crucial for patient comfort during procedures like extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL).
  • Propofol and fentanyl are commonly used agents for procedural sedation.
  • Comparing anesthesiologist-controlled sedation (ACS) with patient-controlled sedation (PCS) can optimize sedation strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare anesthesiologist-controlled sedation (ACS) versus patient-controlled sedation (PCS) for patients undergoing ESWL.
  • To evaluate differences in propofol requirements, sedation levels, and recovery times between ACS and PCS.

Main Methods:

  • A double-blind study randomized 64 patients undergoing ESWL to either ACS or PCS with propofol.
  • Sedation was monitored using the A-line ARX index; analgesia with the visual analogue scale.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Psychomotor recovery and discharge readiness were assessed using the Trieger dot test and postanesthesia discharge score.
  • Main Results:

    • Anesthesiologist-controlled sedation (ACS) group received more propofol (398 mg vs. 199 mg) and achieved deeper sedation (ARX index 35 vs. 73).
    • Patients in the ACS group experienced less pain (VAS 0 vs. 3) and reported higher satisfaction (median 7 vs. 6).
    • Patient-controlled sedation (PCS) group demonstrated faster psychomotor recovery (8 vs. 16 dots missed) and earlier discharge readiness (40 min vs. 88 min).

    Conclusions:

    • Anesthesiologist-controlled sedation (ACS) with propofol/fentanyl provides superior sedation and comfort for ESWL compared to PCS.
    • However, ACS is linked to increased propofol use and delayed recovery and discharge criteria achievement.
    • PCS facilitates quicker recovery and earlier discharge readiness in patients undergoing ESWL.