Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Health status: what does it mean for payers and patients?

Paul W Jones1

  • 1St George's, University of London, UK. pjones@sgul.ac.uk

Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society
|April 26, 2006
PubMed
Summary

Health status measures patient functioning, not quality of life. While useful for assessing average treatment effects, health status scores do not predict individual patient outcomes or mortality risk.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Predictors of COPD exacerbations differ between grades of airflow limitation.

ERJ open research·2026
Same author

A prospective study of maintenance treatment for COPD patients hospitalised for severe exacerbations.

Respiratory medicine·2026
Same author

Can Patient Education Lead the Way? Head-To-Head Comparison of EXACT and CERT for Early Recognition of Acute COPD Exacerbations.

Respirology (Carlton, Vic.)·2025
Same author

Validation and Further Analysis of the COPD Exacerbation Recognition Tool (CERT).

Respirology (Carlton, Vic.)·2025
Same author

Validity of the Chronic Airways Assessment Test (CAAT) in asthma, asthma+COPD and COPD in NOVELTY.

ERJ open research·2025
Same author

Real-world effectiveness study of guideline-directed COPD STANDARDized management in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a cluster randomised trial design.

BMJ open respiratory research·2025

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Epidemiology
  • Health Outcomes Research
  • Patient-Reported Outcomes

Background:

  • Health disturbances encompass limitations in daily activities and individualized circumstances.
  • A critical distinction exists between health status and health-related quality of life.
  • Standardized health status questionnaires, often population-based, measure average treatment effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To differentiate between health status and health-related quality of life measures.
  • To clarify the interpretation of health status scores in clinical research and therapeutic studies.
  • To examine the relationship between health status, disease activity, and patient outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the conceptual differences between health status and quality of life.
  • Review of widely used disease-specific questionnaires, such as the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire.
  • Examination of population-based measurements and their implications for interpreting average results.

Main Results:

  • Health status questionnaires measure the effects of disease, not the disease itself.
  • Average health status scores inform payers about treatment effects but offer limited individual benefit prediction.
  • Improved health status reflects moderated disease activity, not a direct improvement in mortality or morbidity.

Conclusions:

  • Health status and quality of life are distinct concepts requiring careful differentiation in research.
  • Interpreting health status scores necessitates consideration of individual patient circumstances and baseline states.
  • Therapeutic improvements in health status indicate disease moderation, with implications for understanding patient prognosis.

Related Experiment Videos