Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 3, 2026

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers
Published on: March 14, 2018
[Reliability of birth certificate data in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1999-2001]
Mariza Miranda Theme Filha1, Silvana Granado Nogueira da Gama, Cynthia Braga da Cunha
1Coordenação de Programas de Epidemiologia, Secretaria Municipal de Saúde do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. mtheme@pcrj.rj.gov.br
Abstract:
The objective of this article is to assess coverage and reliability of data from the Information System on Live Births in the City of Rio de Janeiro, based on an analysis of live birth certificates issued by the various hospitals and compared to information from the "Study on Neonatal and Perinatal Morbidity and Mortality and Care in the City of Rio de Janeiro". A total of 9,608 interviews with post-partum women were paired case-by-case with the respective birth certificates. The statistical analysis consisted of calculating the Kappa index adjusted to the prevalence of categorical variables and the intra-class correlation coefficient for continuous variables, with a 95% significance level. The study showed excellent coverage (96.5%) for hospital births in the City of Rio de Janeiro during the period studied. The variables presenting the highest concordance levels (over 0.90) were the infant's sex, birth weight, mother's age, type of delivery, and type of pregnancy. The variables marital status, mother's schooling, and number of prenatal visits showed lower reliability indices (Kappa < 0.70). The article discusses the importance of data quality in the Information System on Live Births (SINASC) and the system's use as a tool to help define maternal and child health policies.
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Random and Systematic Errors
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Random and Systematic Errors
Distribution Reliability and Automation

