Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

07:32
Measuring Maxillary Posterior Tooth Movement: A Model Assessment using Palatal and Dental Superimposition
Published on: February 23, 2024
Tooth size discrepancies and arch parameters among different malocclusions in a Jordanian sample
Susan N Al-Khateeb1, Elham S J Abu Alhaija
1Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Jordan University of Science and Technology, 22110 Irbid, Jordan.
The Angle Orthodontist
|April 28, 2006
Summary
This study found significant differences in tooth size and arch dimensions across various malocclusions in Jordanian youth. Females generally have smaller teeth, and Class III malocclusions exhibit larger teeth and arch dimensions compared to other groups.
Area of Science:
- Orthodontics
- Dental Anthropology
Background:
- Understanding variations in dentition and arch dimensions is crucial for diagnosing and treating malocclusions.
- Previous research has indicated gender and ethnic differences in tooth morphology and arch form.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine mean mesiodistal tooth width, Bolton ratios, arch length, and arch width in different malocclusions within a Jordanian sample.
- To investigate potential correlations between malocclusion types and these dental and archometric parameters.
Main Methods:
- A sample of 140 orthodontic models from Jordanian students (aged 13-15) representing Class I, II (div 1 & 2), and III malocclusions were analyzed.
- Mesiodistal tooth width, arch width, and length were measured; Bolton ratios were calculated.
- Statistical analysis included Student's t-test and analysis of variance to compare groups.
Main Results:
- Females exhibited smaller teeth than males.
- Class III malocclusion showed larger teeth compared to other categories.
- Class II division 1 presented the narrowest maxillary arch; mandibular intercanine width was larger in Class III.
- No significant differences in Bolton ratios were observed across malocclusions.
- Arch length and width varied significantly between different malocclusion groups.
Conclusions:
- Significant differences in tooth size exist between genders and among malocclusion types.
- Arch dimensions (width and length) also demonstrate variations related to malocclusion.
- These findings contribute to understanding population-specific dental morphology for improved orthodontic treatment planning.