Related Experiment Videos
Further exploration of the Penh parameter
1Buxco Research Systems, Wilmington, North Carolina, USA. mrl@buxco.com
Summary
Unrestrained plethysmography (UP) and Penh are useful for measuring airway reactivity in mice. However, this study shows that the type of plethysmograph used significantly impacts results, with flow plethysmographs better reflecting airway resistance.
Area of Science:
- Respiratory Physiology
- Pulmonary Function Testing
- Animal Models of Respiratory Disease
Background:
- Unrestrained plethysmography (UP) is a common non-invasive method for assessing airway reactivity in mice, often using the Penh parameter.
- Previous studies have shown correlations between Penh and measures of airway constriction, but recent arguments question its validity for resistance measurements.
- Concerns exist that the UP waveform and Penh are primarily influenced by respiratory conditioning rather than airway resistance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To mathematically analyze unrestrained plethysmography (UP) waveforms from two types of whole body plethysmographs (WBPs): sealed (pressure, PWBP) and flow (FWBP).
- To evaluate the influence of respiratory conditioning versus airway resistance on UP measurements at room temperature.
- To determine if the Penh parameter accurately reflects changes in airway resistance during challenges like methacholine administration.
Main Methods:
- Mathematical analysis of UP waveforms generated by pressure-based WBPs (PWBP) and flow-based WBPs (FWBP).
- Comparison of waveform characteristics under different conditions, focusing on the impact of resistance and conditioning.
- Evaluation of the Penh parameter derived from FWBP signals in response to methacholine challenge.
Main Results:
- The PWBP waveform is predominantly influenced by respiratory conditioning, showing minimal changes due to airway resistance at room temperature.
- In contrast, the FWBP waveform clearly reflects changes in airway resistance (sRaw) even at room temperature.
- Changes in the FWBP waveform during methacholine challenge are attributable to airway resistance, not solely conditioning or respiratory timing alterations.
Conclusions:
- The validity of UP and Penh for measuring airway resistance depends critically on the type of whole body plethysmograph used.
- Pressure-based WBPs (PWBP) are not suitable for assessing airway resistance due to dominance by conditioning effects.
- Flow-based WBPs (FWBP) provide a waveform that accurately reflects airway resistance, and the Penh parameter derived from it can quantify these changes effectively.