Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A decision-making framework for sediment contamination.

Peter M Chapman1, Janette Anderson

  • 1Golder Associates, North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. pchapman@attglobal.net

Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
|April 28, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Toward harmonizing ecotoxicity characterization in life cycle impact assessment.

Environmental toxicology and chemistry·2018
Same author

Negatives and Positives: Contaminants and Other Stressors in Aquatic Ecosystems.

Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology·2017
Same author

Reply to Calow: In defense of science and its inclusion in decision making.

Integrated environmental assessment and management·2017
Same author

Collaborative research among academia, business, and government.

Integrated environmental assessment and management·2017
Same author

Total Suspended Solids Effects on Freshwater Lake Biota Other than Fish.

Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology·2017
Same author

Science, antiscience, and environmental decision making: A call to action.

Integrated environmental assessment and management·2017
Same journal

Boring into groundwater impact predictions of hardrock mines in Canada reveals inconsistent modelling timelines, monitoring plans, and consideration of climate change.

Integrated environmental assessment and management·2026
Same journal

Brazilian soil conditions in ecotoxicological tests: do international protocols represent the reality?

Integrated environmental assessment and management·2026
Same journal

Correction to: Evaluation of pesticide residues in cereals at BBCH 30-39 to inform the wild mammals risk assessment (medium herbivorous scenario).

Integrated environmental assessment and management·2026
Same journal

Valuation of River Ecosystem Services by Rural Communities in the Colombian Orinoquia: A Volunteer Labor-for-Restoration Choice Experiment.

Integrated environmental assessment and management·2026
Same journal

Beyond Source Restrictions: Combined Mitigation Strategies Substantially Reduce Emissions and Exposure of Intentionally Added Microplastics in the UK.

Integrated environmental assessment and management·2026
Same journal

The role of Life Cycle Assessment in the Safe and Sustainable by Design: lessons learnt from a case study.

Integrated environmental assessment and management·2026
See all related articles

This study presents a standardized framework for assessing sediment pollution, prioritizing biological data and a weight of evidence approach over simple chemistry. It guides decisions on sediment remediation to ensure environmental protection.

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Ecotoxicology
  • Risk Assessment

Background:

  • Sediment contamination poses risks to aquatic ecosystems.
  • Standardized, scientifically robust decision-making frameworks are needed for pollution assessment.
  • Existing methods may lack comprehensiveness or rely too heavily on single data types.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a prescriptive yet flexible decision-making framework for determining sediment pollution.
  • To standardize the process of evaluating contaminated sediments for remediation.
  • To integrate multiple lines of evidence for more reliable pollution assessments.

Main Methods:

  • The framework emphasizes four key rules, prioritizing biological data and a weight of evidence (WOE) approach.

Related Experiment Videos

  • It integrates sediment chemistry, toxicity testing (acute and chronic), community alteration (field observations), and biomagnification potential.
  • Exclusion criteria include concentrations below sediment quality guidelines (SQGs) predicting low infauna toxicity and no biomagnification potential, or below reference concentrations.

    • Main Results:

    • The framework utilizes a weight of evidence (WOE) matrix combining up to four lines of evidence (LOE).
    • Out of 16 possible WOE scenarios, 6 yield definitive decisions, while 10 necessitate further assessment.
    • The framework is primarily applied to surficial sediments but accounts for potential exposure to deeper sediments.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed framework provides a standardized, evidence-based approach to sediment pollution assessment and remediation decisions.
    • Prioritizing biological data and integrating multiple lines of evidence enhances the reliability of pollution determinations.
    • The framework aims to prevent environmental harm by ensuring remedial actions are justified and effective.