Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Does being against euthanasia legislation equate to being anti-euthanasia?

C M Cartwright1, G M Williams, M H Parker

  • 1Aged Services Learning and Research Collaboration, Southern Cross University, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia. colleen.cartwright@scu.edu.au

Internal Medicine Journal
|April 28, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Thyroxine-Accelerated Larval Development in the Crown-of-Thorns Starfish, Acanthaster planci.

The Biological bulletin·2017
Same author

Effects of optical bias on moving gratings in bismuth silicon oxide at large fringe modulation.

Applied optics·2010
Same author

Holographic-recording improvement in a bismuth silicon oxide crystal by the moving-grating technique.

Applied optics·2010
Same author

Optical pattern recognition using a synthetic discriminant amplitude-compensated matched filter.

Applied optics·2010
Same author

Real-time color image correlation with a color liquid-crystal television and a Fresnel holographic filter.

Applied optics·2010
Same author

Enhancement of Two-Wave Coupling in a Ce:KNSBN Crystal with Optimum Polarization of the Writing Beams.

Applied optics·2008
Same journal

The paradox of peer review: protecting science or policing thought?

Internal medicine journal·2026
Same journal

Immune-related pancytopenia in pregnancy.

Internal medicine journal·2026
Same journal

Crossover effect: causal machine learning reveals opposing mortality responses to mean arterial pressure targets among phenotypically distinct hypertensive patients with septic shock.

Internal medicine journal·2026
Same journal

Clinicopathological findings, correlations and outcomes in patients with renal disease and living with antiretroviral-treated human immunodeficiency virus infection.

Internal medicine journal·2026
Same journal

Approach to thyroid disorders associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Internal medicine journal·2026
Same journal

A scoping review of specialist hypertension clinics.

Internal medicine journal·2026
See all related articles

Opposition to euthanasia legislation does not always mean opposition to euthanasia itself. This study surveyed health professionals and community members on their views regarding active voluntary euthanasia (AVE).

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Public Health Policy
  • Sociology

Background:

  • Qualitative studies indicated a nuanced stance on euthanasia, where opposition to legislation didn't equate to being anti-euthanasia.
  • Understanding these distinctions is crucial for informed policy development and public discourse.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantitatively assess attitudes towards euthanasia legislation among medical practitioners, nurses, and community members.
  • To explore the relationship between opposition to euthanasia legislation and broader attitudes towards euthanasia.

Main Methods:

  • A postal survey was distributed to 1002 medical practitioners, 1000 nurses, and 1200 community members.
  • The survey included a direct question on legalizing active voluntary euthanasia (AVE) and four statements assessing attitudes towards euthanasia under different legislative scenarios.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Response rates were 43% for doctors, 45% for nurses, and 38% for community members.

    • Main Results:

    • A slight increase in support for legalizing AVE was observed among medical practitioners compared to previous studies.
    • Community members showed a slight decrease in support for legalizing AVE.
    • Attitudes among nurses remained largely unchanged, with no significant shift in support for AVE.

    Conclusions:

    • The findings suggest a complex and evolving landscape of public and professional opinion on euthanasia.
    • Interpreting survey data on euthanasia attitudes requires careful consideration of question framing and respondent perspectives.
    • Further research is needed to fully understand the factors influencing these nuanced views on euthanasia legislation.