Comparing monotic and diotic selective auditory attention abilities in children
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026
Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults
Published on: October 19, 2014
Rochelle Cherry1, Adrienne Rubinstein
1Brooklyn College, New York 11210, USA.
Purpose:
Some researchers have assessed ear-specific performance of auditory processing ability using speech recognition tasks with normative data based on diotic administration. The present study investigated whether monotic and diotic administrations yield similar results using the Selective Auditory Attention Test.
Method:
Seventy-two typically achieving children were tested both monotically and diotically in a counterbalanced, repeated measures design.
Results:
Results revealed that diotic scores were significantly higher than monotic scores, with no significant difference between right and left ears.
Conclusion:
Collecting ear-specific normative data is recommended over extrapolating from norms using a diotic speech recognition test. Because a binaural advantage may be found when listening under challenging conditions, the strategy of occluding one ear in children with (central) auditory processing disorder ([C]APD) should be reconsidered.
