Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Construct validity testing of a laparoscopic surgical simulator.

Elspeth M McDougall1, Federico A Corica, John R Boker

  • 1Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA, USA.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons
|May 2, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Finding a solution: preliminary results of percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes under saline-restricted irrigation conditions.

World journal of urology·2026
Same author

Comparative Analysis of A Novel Air-Bubble Guided Percutaneous Access Technique Against Traditional Fluoroscopic Techniques.

Journal of endourology·2026
Same author

Characterization of α, β, and muscarinic receptor distribution in porcine ureters: a translational model for pharmacological ureteral dilation.

American journal of physiology. Renal physiology·2026
Same author

Stone Volume: Time for a Paradigm Shift.

Journal of endourology·2026
Same author

Ureteral Access Sheath Deployment: Understanding the Force Tolerance of the Human Ureter and the Development of Ureteral Injury During Endoscopic Surgery.

Journal of endourology·2025
Same author

The Science of Surgical Force: A New Field of Study in Urology.

Journal of endourology·2025
Same journal

Breaking the Polytrauma-Brain Barrier: Using Point-of-Care Biomarkers in Severely Injured Trauma Patients.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons·2026
Same journal

Going the Extra Mile: Picking the Right Trauma Center Destination for Critically Injured Patients in a Mature State-Wide Trauma System.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons·2026
Same journal

What Does It Mean for Surgeons to Be Flourishing?

Journal of the American College of Surgeons·2026
Same journal

Tailor-Made Solution to Trimming Venous Thromboembolism Risk.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons·2026
Same journal

NIH Funding in Surgical Artificial Intelligence: Who, What, Where, Why.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons·2026
Same journal

Efficacy and Safety of Rezūm Water Vapor Thermal Ablation in Large and Small Prostates: A Multicenter Comparative Analysis of 2,725 Patients.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons·2026
See all related articles

The LAPMentor virtual reality simulator effectively differentiates surgical skill levels. Experienced surgeons scored higher than residents and medical students on most tasks, with fulguration skills showing the most significant differences.

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Simulation and Training
  • Medical Education Technology
  • Virtual Reality in Medicine

Background:

  • Initial data on the construct, content, and face validity of the LAPMentor virtual reality laparoscopic surgical simulator are presented.
  • The LAPMentor is a tool designed to enhance laparoscopic surgical training.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the construct validity of the LAPMentor surgical simulator.
  • To determine if the simulator can differentiate between varying levels of laparoscopic surgical experience.

Main Methods:

  • Medical students (MS), residents/fellows (R/F), and experienced surgeons (ES) were tested on 9 basic laparoscopic skills (SK).
  • Experienced surgeons were divided into two groups: those with <30 (ES<30) and >30 (ES>30) laparoscopic cases annually.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Skills assessed included camera manipulation, eye-hand coordination, and various procedural tasks.

    • Main Results:

    • All experienced groups (ES>30, ES<30, R/F) significantly outperformed medical students on lower-level skills (SK3-6).
    • On higher-level skills (SK7-9), experienced surgeons generally scored higher than residents/fellows, who in turn outperformed medical students.
    • The fulguration task (SK8) demonstrated the most significant differentiation across all skill levels.

    Conclusions:

    • The non-camera skills (SK3-9) of the LAPMentor simulator effectively distinguish between laparoscopically naive individuals and experienced surgeons.
    • The fulguration skill task (SK8) exhibits the highest construct validity, accurately differentiating between medical students, residents/fellows, and experienced surgeons with varying case volumes.