Assisted laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for the treatment of esophageal cancer
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

Low-Cost Single-Port (LoCoSP) Device for a Transcervical Approach in Minimally Invasive Transhiatal Esophagectomy
Published on: September 11, 2021
Fernando Delgado Gomis1, Segundo A Gómez Abril, Manuel Martínez Abad
1Servicio de Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Dr. Peset, S.V.S. Valencia, Spain.
Background:
Esophageal resection for the treatment of esophageal cancer is usually associated with high morbido-mortality risks, that can be reduced using laparoscopy. Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy (LTE) has the potential to improve these results but, to-date, only a few limited series of cases have been reported. This report summarizes our experience in 24 cases.
Objective:
To assess the outcomes following LTE.
Methods And Materials:
Between 1998 and 2005, LTE was performed in 24 patients; 18 men and 6 women with an overall mean age of 63 years (range: 36-85). Indication for surgery was lower third esophageal cancer; 11 squamous cell carcinoma and 13 adenocarcinoma. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy were used in 18 patients (75%). A laparoscopic transhiatal approach was used to perform an esophagectomy with curative intent. A cervical esophagogastric anastomosis was created.
Results:
No reversion to conventional open surgery was required. Mean anesthesia time was 293.8 min (range: 255-360). Major complications occurred in 7 patients (29.2%). Two patients (8.3%) had leakage from the cervical anastomosis. Surgical mortality was 8.3%. The median stay in Intensive Care Unit was 5 days (range: 1-29). Median hospital stay was 11.5 days (range: 7-54). At a mean follow-up of 24.9 months, 8 patients (36.4%) had disease recurrence (36.4%), global survival rate was 62.5%, and diseasefree survival rate was 50%.
Conclusions:
Assisted laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for lower third esophageal cancer is a potentially safe and effective method when performed by surgeons with expertise in the field. Benefits from this approach need to be confirmed by further randomized studies.
