Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Stability of dynamic trunk movement.

Kevin P Granata1, Scott A England

  • 1Musculoskeletal Biomechanics Laboratories, Department of Engineering Science & Mechanics, School of Biomedical Engineering & Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA. Granata@VT.edu

Spine
|May 2, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ankle bracing and the neuromuscular factors influencing joint stiffness.

Journal of athletic training·2009
Same author

Linear time delay methods and stability analyses of the human spine. Effects of neuromuscular reflex response.

IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society·2008
Same author

The viscoelastic standard nonlinear solid model: predicting the response of the lumbar intervertebral disk to low-frequency vibrations.

Journal of biomechanical engineering·2008
Same author

Process stationarity and reliability of trunk postural stability.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2008
Same author

Effects of trunk exertion force and direction on postural control of the trunk during unstable sitting.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2008
Same author

Effects of seated whole-body vibration on postural control of the trunk during unstable seated balance.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2007

Dynamic trunk movements reveal that faster paces and asymmetric directions limit spinal stability. These findings aid in workplace design and clinical assessment for low back pain.

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Dynamical Systems Theory
  • Spinal Kinematics

Background:

  • Spinal stability is well-defined statically but poorly understood dynamically.
  • Existing biomechanical models offer limited insight into dynamic spinal movement stability.
  • Lyapunov analyses of empirical data can estimate stability during dynamic movements.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine how movement pace and direction affect dynamic trunk flexion and extension stability.
  • To investigate the influence of movement parameters on local dynamic stability control.

Main Methods:

  • Nonlinear systems analyses of trunk kinematics were used.
  • Twenty healthy subjects performed repetitive trunk flexion/extension at 20 and 40 cycles per minute.
  • Maximum Lyapunov exponents were calculated from trunk kinematics to assess dynamic stability.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Torso movement dynamics complexity required at least 5 embedded dimensions.
  • Fast-paced movements showed quicker trajectory divergence, indicating limited local dynamic stability.
  • Midsagittal plane movements exhibited higher kinematic divergence than asymmetric movements.

Conclusions:

  • Nonlinear dynamic systems analysis successfully characterized neuromuscular control of stability during dynamic trunk movements.
  • Movement pace and direction significantly influence spinal stability control.
  • Recommended for workplace design and clinical assessment of spinal stability in low back pain patients.