Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

Simultaneous Assessment of Kinship, Division Number, and Phenotype via Flow Cytometry for Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells
Published on: March 24, 2023
A cautionary note on the use of simulation procedures for analyzing contingency tables containing small expected cell
Jaime R Robles1, Edwin J C G van den Oord
1Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, 23298-0126, USA. jrobles@vcu.edu
Abstract:
A comparison of a simple simulation procedure and exact tests for tables used in psychiatric genetic studies is performed, with focus on tables with small expected cell counts. The study shows that naive simulation procedures using uniform random numbers, could lead to conservative results, as compared with Fisher exact test for contingency tables, thus discarding as non-significant tables that are significant according to the exact test. Exact tests are recommended as an alternative to naive simulation for evaluating the statistical significance of contingency tables with small expected cell counts.
Related Concept Videos
Determination of Expected Frequency
Contingency Table
Introduction to Test of Independence
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests
Fisher's Exact Test
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...