Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026

Relating Stomatal Conductance to Leaf Functional Traits
Published on: October 12, 2015
Evaluation of season, temperature, and water stress effects on stomata using a leaf conductance model
1United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, Colorado 80526.
Abstract:
A model was developed earlier describing conductance for three conifers (Picea engelmannii Parry ex Engelm., Abies lasiocarpa [Hook.] Nutt., and Pinus contorta var. latifolia Engelm.) and one hardwood (Populus tremuloides Michx.) using only two terms, photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) and absolute humidity difference from leaf to air (DAH). Using residual analysis techniques (actual minus estimated conductance), it was determined that no seasonal or temperature effects existed that were not taken into account with PPFD and DAH. However, conductance was reduced on days following cold nights (below 4 degrees C) or, in aspen, when xylem pressure potential was below -20 bars (1 bar = 10(5) Pa). The following model takes these terms into account: Conductance = b(1) ( radicalPPFD/ radicalDAH) + b(2) ( radicalPPFD/DAH) + b(3) ( radicalPPFD/DAH(2)) + b(4)f(T(min)) + b(5)f(psi(threshold)), where the first three terms describe normal conductance, and the last two terms account for reductions in conductance caused by cold night temperatures or water stress.
More Related Videos
12:11Measurement of Leaf Hydraulic Conductance and Stomatal Conductance and Their Responses to Irradiance and Dehydration Using the Evaporative Flux Method (EFM)
Published on: December 31, 2012
07:08Identification of Novel Regulators of Plant Transpiration by Large-Scale Thermal Imaging Screening in Helianthus Annuus
Published on: January 30, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Regulation of Transpiration by Stomata
Adaptations that Reduce Water Loss
Responses to Heat and Cold Stress
Responses to Drought and Flooding
Responses to Salt Stress