Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Removing well-fixed total knee arthroplasty implants.

J Bohannon Mason1, Thomas K Fehring

  • 1OrthoCarolina Hip & Knee Center, Charlotte, NC 28207, USA. bo.mason@orthocarolina.com

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
|May 5, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The true fate of the 2-stage revision arthroplasty for hip and knee prosthetic joint infection.

Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy·2026
Same author

Trends in Reimbursement for One- versus Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same author

One-Stage Versus Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Prospective Randomized Trial.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2026
Same author

Perioperative Best Practices When Using Cemented Femoral Stem Fixation During Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Geriatric Femoral Neck Fractures.

The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons·2025
Same author

Trends in Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria in Surgically Treated Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Decade of Experience at a Regional Referral Center.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2025
Same author

Outcome of Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention for Treatment of Late Acute Hematogenous Periprosthetic Joint Infections.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2025
Same journal

Which Factors Are Associated With Death, Local Recurrence, and Perioperative Complications After En Bloc Resection for Primary Malignant Tumors of the Mobile Spine?

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
Same journal

Impact Microindentation Evaluates Bone Strength, Bone Quality, and Fracture Susceptibility Across Skeletal Sites: A Cadaver Study.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
Same journal

What Is the Effect of Robot Reduction in Displaced Pelvic Fractures? A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
Same journal

CORR Insights®: Acute or Delayed TKA for Tibial Plateau Fracture? An Observational Study From the Swedish Arthroplasty Register.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
Same journal

Reply to the Letter to the Editor: Guest Editorial: Recalling a Recall.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
Same journal

Radial Head Fractures Cluster in the Anterolateral and Anteromedial Quadrants and Do Not Correlate With Coronoid Fracture Types.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
See all related articles

Removing well-fixed knee components during revision total knee arthroplasty is challenging. Careful technique preserves bone stock and aids reconstruction, utilizing various tools based on individual case needs.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) necessitates removal of prior components.
  • Well-fixed components pose a significant challenge, risking bone loss.
  • Effective component removal is crucial for successful revision outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review techniques for removing well-fixed components in revision TKA.
  • To discuss the applicability of various tools and methods based on surgeon experience.
  • To guide component removal strategies in complex revision cases.

Main Methods:

  • Review of techniques including osteotomes, saws, and extraction devices.
  • Discussion of ultrasonic devices and combined approaches.
  • Based on anecdotal experience from over 800 revision TKAs.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Component removal is highly dependent on the unique challenges of each revision.
  • A combination of tools is often required for effective removal.
  • Preservation of host bone stock is a key consideration.

Conclusions:

  • Careful removal of well-fixed components is vital for revision TKA.
  • Surgeons must select appropriate techniques to preserve bone stock.
  • Empiric bias and experience guide the choice of removal methods.