Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026

A Porcine Model of Acute Autologous Pulmonary Embolism
Published on: September 6, 2024
[Clinical analysis of 8 cases of paradoxical embolism]
Chang-ming Xiong1, Zhi-hong Liu, Xian-sheng Cheng
1Pulmonary Vascular Disease Center, Cardiovascular Institute and Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037, China.
Objective:
To describe the clinical features of paradoxical embolism and therefore to improve its diagnosis.
Methods:
Case analysis and literature review.
Results:
Eight cases of pulmonary embolism complicated with paradoxical embolism were diagnosed, of whom there were six men and two women (mean age, 47.6 years). Patent foramen ovale with right to left shunt was identified in only 3 cases. Cerebral embolism occurred in three patients, kidney artery embolism in 2 patients, left atrial thrombus in 1 patient, lower limb artery and aortic embolism in 1 patients respectively. The diagnosis of paradoxical embolism can only be confirmed when a venous thrombus was detected lodged at arterial-venous communication; otherwise, paradoxical embolism was considered a clinical diagnosis. Of the 8 cases, 7 were clinically diagnosed, while 1 was confirmed.
Conclusions:
Paradoxical embolism is not uncommon. The diagnosis should be considered when venous thromboembolism is complicated with systematic embolism or unknown cause of systematic embolism.
Insights
Paradoxical embolism, a condition where venous clots travel to systemic arteries, is not rare. Diagnosis is crucial when venous thromboembolism presents with systemic embolism or an unknown cause.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Neurology
- Vascular Medicine
Background:
- Paradoxical embolism occurs when a venous thrombus bypasses the pulmonary circulation and enters systemic arterial circulation.
- Diagnosis can be challenging, often requiring a high index of suspicion.
Observation:
- This study analyzed eight cases of paradoxical embolism, with common presentations including cerebral and kidney artery embolism.
- Only three cases showed a patent foramen ovale with a right-to-left shunt, highlighting that this is not always present.
- The diagnosis was confirmed in only one case, with the remainder being clinical diagnoses based on venous thrombus at arterial-venous communication.
Findings:
- Paradoxical embolism is an underdiagnosed condition that can complicate venous thromboembolism.
- Systemic embolism in the context of venous thromboembolism or with an unknown etiology warrants consideration of paradoxical embolism.
- Clinical diagnosis is often relied upon due to the difficulty in confirming the presence of a venous thrombus at an arterial-venous communication.
Implications:
- Improved diagnostic strategies are needed to identify paradoxical embolism more effectively.
- Early recognition and management can prevent severe systemic complications.
- Further research into the specific diagnostic criteria and imaging techniques for paradoxical embolism is warranted.
Related Concept Videos
Pulmonary Embolism I: Introduction
Pulmonary Embolism I: Introduction
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism III: Nursing Management
Measurement of Blood Pressure
Venous Thrombosis I: Introduction