Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026

A Mouse Distraction Osteogenesis Model
Published on: November 14, 2018
Expression of nerve growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor in the inferior alveolar nerve after
1Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Medicine and Institute of Health Science, Gyeongsang National University, Chilam-dong 90, Jinju-city, Republic of Korea.
Abstract:
The objective of this study was to evaluate changes occurring in the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) subsequent to mandibular distraction osteogenesis, with regard to the expression of nerve growth factor (NGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Unilateral mandibular distractions (0.5mm each, twice per day for 10 days) were conducted on 8 mongrel dogs. Two animals were killed at 7, 14, 28 and 56 days after completion of distraction. The distracted IAN and contralateral control nerve were then harvested and analysed histologically and immunohistochemically. Signs of acute nerve injury, including demyelination, were observed in the distracted IAN on the 7th and 14th day after distraction. At 56 days, the histological features of the distracted IAN were similar to those of the control nerve. The levels of NGF and VEGF expression were significantly elevated on the 7th and 14th day after distraction. NGF was expressed in most of the distracted nerve tissues, but VEGF was primarily detected in Schwann cells and the neurovasorum. VEGF expression had returned to normal but NGF expression was still profoundly elevated 28 days after distraction. NGF expression returned to normal levels at 56 days after distraction. NGF and VEGF appeared to have been elicited from the Schwann cells and damaged nervous tissues, and they may play important roles in the initial healing of damaged nerves. VEGF expression returned to normal more quickly than did NGF expression. This may indicate that hypoxic conditions within the distracted nerve had recovered to normal during the early stages of consolidation. Micro-vessels in the distracted nerve may have recovered more rapidly than did the nerve tissue itself.
More Related Videos
06:48Ethanol-Induced Cervical Sympathetic Ganglion Block Applications for Promoting Canine Inferior Alveolar Nerve Regeneration Using an Artificial Nerve
Published on: November 30, 2018
09:34Visualizing Angiogenesis by Multiphoton Microscopy In Vivo in Genetically Modified 3D-PLGA/nHAp Scaffold for Calvarial Critical Bone Defect Repair
Published on: September 7, 2017