Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Lumbar degenerative classification study.

Steven D Glassman1, Leah Y Carreon, John R Dimar

  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky, USA. tallgeyer@spinemds.com

American Journal of Orthopedics (Belle Mead, N.J.)
|May 13, 2006
PubMed
Summary

Classifying the reasons for lumbar fusion surgery is challenging, with surgeons showing only moderate agreement. This highlights the need for better guidelines to compare surgical outcomes for degenerative spine disease.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Durability of One- and Two-Level Lumbar Fusion Surgeries: A Survivorship Analysis Based on Revision Surgery Rates.

Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews·2026
Same author

EQ-5D vs SF-6D: Discrepancies in measuring quality of life for patients with vertebral compression fractures.

Brain & spine·2026
Same author

Carbon Fiber Implants in Spine Surgery.

JBJS reviews·2026
Same author

Utility of Confirmatory Navigational CT Spins in Patients Undergoing One- to Two-Level Instrumented Posterior Fusions.

Spine·2026
Same author

Establishing Minimal Important Change After Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures.

Spine·2026
Same author

Cost-Effectiveness of ABM/P-15 Versus Allograft in Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Surgery : Ten-Year Follow-Up on a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Spine·2026

Area of Science:

  • Spine surgery
  • Orthopedics
  • Neurosurgery

Background:

  • Lumbar degenerative disease is a common cause of back pain and disability.
  • Surgical fusion is a treatment option, but indications can be unclear.
  • Variability in surgical decision-making impacts patient outcomes and research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a classification system for indications for lumbar fusion.
  • To assess interrater reliability among spine surgeons using the proposed classification.

Main Methods:

  • Nineteen spine surgeons reviewed 32 case histories.
  • Surgeons selected fusion indications based on an outlined classification system.
  • Interrater variability was quantified using Kappa (K) coefficients.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The calculated Kappa coefficient for all cases was 0.63, indicating moderate agreement.
  • Significant difficulty was observed in classifying indications for lumbar fusion.
  • Agreement among surgeons was only moderate, even when excluding patient and procedure selection controversies.

Conclusions:

  • Current classification of lumbar fusion indications is challenging and lacks high interrater reliability.
  • The lack of consensus on surgical indications hinders the accurate comparison of outcomes for different surgical techniques or disease processes.
  • Refining nomenclature and classification systems for lumbar fusion indications is crucial for advancing spinal surgery research and practice.