A comparison study of the prevalence of overweight and obese Italian preschool children using different reference

Enrico Vidal1, Eva Carlin, Daniela Driul

  • 1Department of Pediatrics, University of Udine, School of Medicine, P.le S. M. della Misericordia, Udine, 33100, Italy. enrico.vidal@inwind.it

Insights

Childhood obesity is rising, with different growth charts impacting prevalence estimates. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) charts identify more obese children under five, enabling earlier intervention for weight problems.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatrics
  • Public Health
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Rising rates of overweight and obesity in children globally.
  • Limited focus on preschool-aged children in epidemiological surveys.
  • Need to evaluate prevalence in 3-6 year olds in North-East Italy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Determine the prevalence of overweight and obesity in preschool children (3-6 years) in North-East Italy.
  • Compare Body Mass Index (BMI) data against three different standards: CDC, International Obesity Task Force (IOTF), and Luciano et al. (2003).

Main Methods:

  • Study included 258 children (124 males, 134 females) aged 4.8 years on average.
  • Weight and height measured to calculate BMI (kg/m²).
  • Prevalence determined using CDC, IOTF, and Luciano et al. growth curves.

Main Results:

  • All three methods yielded similar overweight prevalence estimates for boys and girls.
  • CDC curves showed significantly higher obesity prevalence in both sexes compared to IOTF and Luciano et al. charts.
  • CDC charts identified more cases of obesity, particularly in children under five.

Conclusions:

  • Different growth charts yield varying obesity prevalence rates in preschool children.
  • CDC growth curves may overestimate obesity prevalence but allow for earlier identification of weight issues.
  • Earlier identification via CDC charts offers potential for timely intervention in at-risk children.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when researchers try to extrapolate results...
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...