Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Multiple user considerations and their implications in medical error reporting system design.

Kamisha Hamilton Escoto1, Ben-Tzion Karsh, John W Beasley

  • 1MacroErgonomics Safety and Health Laboratory, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA.

Human Factors
|May 16, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Giving Patients the Focused Attention They Deserve.

JAMA internal medicine·2023
Same author

Learning Through Doing: Comprehensive Programming for a Training Program in Cancer Disparities.

Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education·2022
Same author

Promoting Trust and Morale by Changing How the Word Provider Is Used: Encouraging Specificity and Transparency.

JAMA·2021
Same author

Standardization vs Customization: Finding the Right Balance.

Annals of family medicine·2021
Same author

Remembering Ben-Tzion Karsh's scholarship, impact, and legacy.

Applied ergonomics·2020
Same author

It's time to bring human factors to primary care policy and practice.

Applied ergonomics·2020
Same journal

Effects of Task Priority and Difficulty in Multitasking Across Screens.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

Compatibility Effects With Simple Lever Tools: A Replication and Extension Beyond Simple Button Responses.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

Effects of Egocentric and Exocentric Supervisor Viewpoint Perspectives on Motion Plan Legibility and Decision Support in Automated Spacecraft Docking Maneuvers.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

System-Wide Trust (SWT) Versus Component-Specific Trust (CST) in Multi-Agent Human-Agent Teams: Individual Variability in Trust Bias.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

Driver Adaptation to Partially Automated Driving in Urban Environments: Effects of Repeated Exposure and System Capabilities on Drivers' Trust, Monitoring, and Response.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

Modeling Human Expertise in a Sanding Task.

Human factors·2026
See all related articles

Physicians and clinical assistants have differing views on medical error reporting systems, impacting design and effectiveness. Understanding these user differences is crucial for successful implementation of these systems.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare quality improvement
  • Medical informatics
  • Human-computer interaction in healthcare

Background:

  • Medical error reporting systems are vital for understanding error causes.
  • User-centered design requires knowledge of differing user needs.
  • Developing effective reporting systems necessitates understanding user similarities and differences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine physician and clinical assistant preferences for a statewide medical error reporting system.
  • To identify key differences in user perspectives that could influence system design and adoption.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted nine-month-long focus groups with physicians and clinical assistants via teleconference.
  • Utilized inductive content analysis on audiotaped and transcribed discussions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Gathered insights from 8 physicians and 6 clinical assistants.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified 86 major and minor themes regarding user preferences.
    • Highlighted significant differences between physicians and clinical assistants concerning system regulations, reporting mediums, and organizational factors influencing reporting.
    • Found shared beliefs but distinct preferences between the two user groups.

    Conclusions:

    • Effective medical error reporting systems require design tailored to diverse user groups.
    • Acknowledging user differences in rules, reporting methods, and organizational context is essential for successful system deployment.
    • This research provides actionable insights for improving the design and implementation of medical error reporting systems.