Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The volume-performance relationship in esophagectomy.

Andrew C Chang1, John D Birkmeyer

  • 1Section of Thoracic Surgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor 48109, USA. andrwchg@umich.edu

Thoracic Surgery Clinics
|May 16, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Margin positivity is not associated with the extent of resection for non-small cell lung cancer.

Surgery·2026
Same author

Impact of gastric ischemic preconditioning before esophagectomy on pathologic response.

Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract·2026
Same author

The effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy-related frailty by analytic morphomics in esophageal cancer.

Journal of cardiothoracic surgery·2026
Same author

Identification of isoform switching events linked with esophageal adenocarcinoma patient survival informs novel prognostic and therapeutic targets.

Cell death & disease·2026
Same author

Safety, efficacy, and patient satisfaction after esophagectomy for esophageal neuromotor disease: A single-institution experience.

JTCVS open·2025
Same author

The Role of Intraoperative Functional Lumen Imaging in Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy and Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy.

Annals of thoracic surgery short reports·2025

Higher hospital and surgeon volume correlate with lower operative mortality for esophageal resection. Identifying minimum volume thresholds remains challenging, but both referral strategies and process improvements are key for high-quality esophagectomy care.

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Outcomes Research
  • Health Services Research
  • Oncology

Background:

  • Existing literature indicates an inverse relationship between hospital/surgeon volume and operative mortality for esophageal resection.
  • Significant heterogeneity in volume-outcome studies complicates the establishment of definitive minimum volume thresholds for optimal performance.
  • This highlights a critical gap in evidence-based policy for esophagectomy care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the volume-outcome relationship in esophageal resection literature.
  • To discuss strategies for translating volume-outcome evidence into clinical policy.
  • To identify challenges and future directions for improving esophagectomy outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Literature synthesis and analysis of existing studies on hospital and surgeon volume in esophageal resection.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of policy implications and implementation strategies.
  • Comparative analysis of volume-based referral versus process improvement initiatives.

    • Main Results:

    • Both hospital and surgeon volume are consistently linked to reduced operative mortality for esophagectomy.
    • Establishing precise minimum volume thresholds is hindered by data heterogeneity.
    • Volume-based referral and process improvement present distinct, sometimes conflicting, policy pathways.

    Conclusions:

    • Translating the volume-outcome relationship into effective policy for esophagectomy requires careful consideration of competing strategies.
    • Despite limitations, both volume-based referral and process improvement warrant continued investigation and application.
    • The ultimate goal is to ensure uniform, high-quality care for all patients undergoing esophagectomy.