Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Assessment for crisis intervention.

Rick A Myer1, Christian Conte

  • 1Department of Counseling, Duquesne University, PA 15282, USA. myerra@duq.edu

Journal of Clinical Psychology
|May 16, 2006
PubMed
Summary

This article introduces a structured method for evaluating how people react to traumatic events. By measuring emotional, physical, and mental responses, clinicians can better tailor their support. The tool is designed to be fast and practical for immediate use during emergencies. It also helps track a person's recovery over time. Two real-world examples show how the system works in practice. A standardized form is provided to help professionals apply this approach.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Developmental perspective dreaming across the lifespan and what this tells us.

International review of neurobiology·2010
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Psychological triage assessment system within clinical mental health
  • Crisis intervention and emergency psychiatry

Background:

Mental health professionals often struggle to evaluate the immediate needs of individuals facing sudden traumatic events. No prior work had resolved how to standardize these rapid evaluations effectively. Prior research has shown that emotional, physical, and mental responses vary significantly across different populations. That uncertainty drove the development of structured frameworks for emergency settings. It was already known that quick identification of symptoms improves patient outcomes significantly. However, existing tools frequently lacked the precision required for high-pressure environments. This gap motivated the creation of a specialized model for immediate psychological stabilization. The current literature emphasizes the need for practical instruments that integrate seamlessly into existing care pathways.

Purpose Of The Study:

This article aims to introduce a structured triage assessment system for use in emergency mental health settings. The authors seek to address the lack of practical tools for evaluating immediate reactions to traumatic events. They identify a need for a method that is both quick and accurate for clinicians. This motivation stems from the challenges professionals face when managing acute psychological distress. The study intends to provide a clear framework for categorizing emotional, behavioral, and cognitive responses. By offering this model, the researchers hope to improve the precision of initial interventions. They also aim to demonstrate how this system can track patient recovery throughout the stabilization process. The work provides a standardized resource to assist practitioners in delivering consistent and effective care.

Keywords:
psychological emergency responseclinical evaluation toolstrauma support strategiesmental health triage

Frequently Asked Questions

The system evaluates affective, behavioral, and cognitive reactions to determine the type and intensity of a client's response. By categorizing these specific domains, clinicians gain a clearer picture of the individual's current psychological state during an emergency.

The Triage Assessment Form: Crisis Intervention serves as the standardized instrument for data collection. This document allows practitioners to record observations systematically, ensuring that the evaluation remains consistent and easy to use during high-pressure situations.

A quick and accurate evaluation is necessary because it allows for immediate integration into the intervention process. This efficiency ensures that clinicians can address urgent needs without delaying support, which is vital when managing acute psychological trauma.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

The authors present a structured approach for evaluating psychological responses to acute stressors. Their review approach involves detailing the components of a specialized diagnostic framework. They describe how to categorize emotional, physical, and mental indicators during initial contact. The methodology focuses on providing a practical instrument for immediate application in emergency settings. Two case studies illustrate the utility of the proposed model in real-world scenarios. The researchers include a standardized form to guide the evaluation process for practitioners. This design emphasizes ease of use and speed to ensure viability in high-pressure environments. The study synthesizes these elements to offer a comprehensive guide for emergency mental health professionals.

Main Results:

The primary finding indicates that the proposed model effectively captures the intensity and nature of client reactions to traumatic events. The system provides a rapid method for gathering information that is directly applicable to immediate support strategies. Data from the case illustrations demonstrate that the framework remains functional across different emergency situations. The authors report that the tool allows for consistent monitoring of patient progress over time. By using the provided form, clinicians can achieve greater accuracy in their initial evaluations. The results suggest that the model successfully bridges the gap between assessment and active intervention. Observations confirm that the system is easy to implement for professionals working in high-stress roles. These findings highlight the utility of structured evaluation in improving the quality of emergency psychological care.

Conclusions:

The authors propose that their structured model enhances the precision of emergency mental health evaluations. This framework allows practitioners to categorize client responses based on specific emotional and cognitive indicators. Clinicians can utilize the provided documentation to ensure consistent data collection across various settings. The system supports ongoing monitoring of patient recovery throughout the stabilization period. Evidence suggests that this approach simplifies the decision-making process for those providing immediate support. The researchers indicate that the tool remains highly adaptable for diverse emergency scenarios. By tracking changes in symptom severity, providers can adjust their strategies to better meet individual needs. This synthesis implies that standardized assessment improves the overall quality of care during acute psychological distress.

The system tracks progress by monitoring changes in a client's reactions throughout the duration of the intervention. This longitudinal data helps providers determine if their current strategies are effective or if adjustments are required to support the individual's recovery.

The model measures the intensity of reactions alongside the type of response experienced by the individual. This dual-focus approach provides a comprehensive overview that helps clinicians prioritize their efforts based on the severity of the symptoms presented.

The authors suggest that their model improves the overall quality of care by providing a clear, structured path for emergency support. They claim that this approach helps practitioners deliver more targeted interventions, ultimately leading to better outcomes for those experiencing acute distress.