Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026
11:07
Biodegradable Magnesium Stent Treatment of Saccular Aneurysms in a Rat Model - Introduction of the Surgical Technique
Published on: October 1, 2017
The Snodgrass repair: is stenting always necessary?
O O'Sullivan1, C A Bannon, H Flood
1Department of Urology, Mid-Western Regional Hospital, Limerick, Ireland. orfhlaith3@yahoo.com
Irish Medical Journal
|May 17, 2006
Summary
Urethral stenting is not necessary for distal hypospadias repairs using the Snodgrass technique. This study found no difference in complication rates, suggesting stenting can be safely abandoned in these cases.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Urology
- Surgical Innovation
Background:
- Hypospadias repair is a common pediatric urological procedure.
- The Snodgrass technique is a widely used method for hypospadias repair.
- The role of urethral stenting in hypospadias repair outcomes remains a subject of investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the necessity of urethral stenting in Snodgrass hypospadias repairs.
- To determine if stenting impacts complication rates and long-term outcomes in distal hypospadias repairs.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 65 boys undergoing hypospadias repair between 1996 and 2001.
- Comparison of outcomes between Snodgrass repairs with and without stenting.
- Fisher's exact test used to analyze fistula incidence based on stent use.
Main Results:
- The overall fistula rate was 6%, with 10.5% in Snodgrass repairs.
- No statistical difference in fistula incidence was observed in distal Snodgrass repairs with or without stenting.
- Meatal narrowing occurred in 5 patients long-term, with 3 in stented Snodgrass repairs.
Conclusions:
- Urethral stenting can be abandoned in distal hypospadias repairs using the Snodgrass technique without compromising patient outcomes.
- The study suggests that stenting does not significantly reduce complication rates or improve long-term results in this specific patient group.
