Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Visual perception and social foraging in birds.

Esteban Fernández-Juricic1, Jonathan T Erichsen, Alex Kacelnik

  • 1Department of Biological Sciences, California State University--Long Beach, Peterson Hall 1-109, 1250 Bellflower Blvd, Long Beach, CA 90840, USA. efernand@csulb.edu

Trends in Ecology & Evolution
|May 17, 2006
PubMed
Summary

Models of bird foraging often assume scanning and foraging are mutually exclusive. This study reveals these models are inaccurate for birds with wide visual fields, highlighting the need for new approaches.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Do more birds mean more bird-aircraft collisions? A meta-analysis testing a key wildlife management tenet.

PloS one·2026
Same author

"Time to See" in Infantile Nystagmus.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same author

A model to quantify the probability of collision between birds and aircraft: Applications for onboard lighting.

Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America·2026
Same author

Visual opponent mechanisms and spectral responses in non-primate vertebrates: taxonomic distribution, sampling, and classification.

PeerJ·2026
Same author

Effects of a high-power laser eye exposure on avian foraging behaviour: implications for the safety of laser bird deterrents.

Conservation physiology·2026
Same author

Record phenological responses to climate change in three sympatric penguin species.

The Journal of animal ecology·2026

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Ecology
  • Avian Biology
  • Visual Ecology

Background:

  • Many social foraging models assume birds cannot forage and scan simultaneously.
  • This assumption is often based on species with narrow visual fields.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To challenge the assumption of mutually exclusive foraging and scanning in birds.
  • To investigate how visual information acquisition is affected by body posture, detection distance, and attention in birds with wide visual fields.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing social foraging models.
  • Analysis of visual information acquisition in relation to body posture and flock dynamics.

Main Results:

  • Prevalent models fail to accurately predict foraging behavior in birds with wide visual fields.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The head-up, head-down dichotomy is an oversimplification for these species.
  • Detection distance and limited attention significantly impact information gathering.

    • Conclusions:

    • Existing foraging models need revision to account for wide visual fields and attentional limits.
    • Understanding visual information flow within flocks is crucial for assessing group living benefits and costs.