Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Reader error during CT colonography: causes and implications for training.

Andrew Slater1, Stuart A Taylor, Emily Tam

  • 1Intestinal Imaging, St. Mark's and Northwick Park Hospitals, Harrow, London, UK.

European Radiology
|May 17, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Morpho-cultural, pathogenic, and molecular diversity, and population structure analysis of <i>Bipolaris sorokiniana</i> causing spot blotch disease in wheat.

Frontiers in microbiology·2026
Same author

Current Practices in Hyperglycemia Management in Neonatal Encephalopathy: A Treatment of Hyperglycemia in Neonatal Encephalopathy (THiNE) Consortium Study.

American journal of perinatology·2026
Same author

Cryoneurolysis for the management of pain secondary to obstetrical brachial plexus injury: a case report.

Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie·2026
Same author

Gender-just reductions in greenhouse gas emissions in maternity care services through the 'baby- friendly hospital initiative': a scoping review.

International breastfeeding journal·2026
Same author

Community-acquired hypervirulent <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> meningitis in Canada: A case report.

IDCases·2026
Same author

Genetic dissection and stability analysis of grain protein content and thousand-grain weight in emmer wheat (Triticum turgidum subsp. dicoccum) germplasm.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

ESR Essentials: pelvic floor imaging-practice recommendations by the European Society of Urogenital Radiology.

European radiology·2026
Same journal

STIR or T2-Dixon? A false dilemma in musculoskeletal MRI.

European radiology·2026
Same journal

ESR Essentials: uterine cancers-practice recommendations by the European Society of Urogenital Radiology.

European radiology·2026
Same journal

Adjunctive quantification for more reproducible amyloid PET interpretation.

European radiology·2026
Same journal

APEX-NET: automated pancreatic evaluation network using early non-contrast CT.

European radiology·2026
Same journal

Temporal bone remodeling after venous stenting for pulsatile tinnitus: isolated dehiscence versus diverticulum.

European radiology·2026
See all related articles

Untrained readers show poor performance in computed tomography colonography (CTC) for polyp detection. Most missed polyps result from perceptual errors, indicating a need for basic training focused on lesion identification.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Gastroenterology
  • Radiology

Background:

  • Computed tomography colonography (CTC) is an emerging colorectal cancer screening tool.
  • Reader performance variability impacts CTC effectiveness.
  • Standardized training protocols are needed to optimize CTC interpretation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess baseline computed tomography colonography (CTC) performance in untrained readers.
  • To identify sources of error in CTC interpretation.
  • To inform the development of future training requirements for CTC readers.

Main Methods:

  • Twenty endoscopically validated CTC datasets with 32 polyps were used.
  • A reference standard was established by experienced radiologists.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Six untrained readers (residents and gastrointestinal radiologists) interpreted the datasets, marking all potential lesions.

    • Main Results:

    • Polyp detection rates varied significantly by size: 7.1–28.6% (1–5 mm), 16.7–41.7% (6–9 mm), and 16.7–83.3% (≥10 mm).
    • No significant difference in polyp detection or false positives was found between residents and experienced gastrointestinal radiologists.
    • The majority of missed polyps (82–95%) were due to failure in detection, not characterization.

    Conclusions:

    • Baseline performance of untrained readers in CTC is variable and generally suboptimal.
    • Perceptual errors, specifically failure to detect lesions, are the primary cause of missed polyps.
    • Future CTC training should prioritize fundamental lesion detection skills.