Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026

Methods of Ex Situ and In Situ Investigations of Structural Transformations: The Case of Crystallization of Metallic Glasses
Published on: June 7, 2018
Solid-solid phase transformation via internal stress-induced virtual melting, significantly below the melting
Valery I Levitas1, Bryan F Henson, Laura B Smilowitz
1Center for Mechanochemistry and Synthesis of New Materials, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, 79409, USA. valery.levitas@ttu.edu
Abstract:
We theoretically predict a new phenomenon, namely, that a solid-solid phase transformation (PT) with a large transformation strain can occur via internal stress-induced virtual melting along the interface at temperatures significantly (more than 100 K) below the melting temperature. We show that the energy of elastic stresses, induced by transformation strain, increases the driving force for melting and reduces the melting temperature. Immediately after melting, stresses relax and the unstable melt solidifies. Fast solidification in a thin layer leads to nanoscale cracking which does not affect the thermodynamics or kinetics of the solid-solid transformation. Thus, virtual melting represents a new mechanism of solid-solid PT, stress relaxation, and loss of coherence at a moving solid-solid interface. It also removes the athermal interface friction and deletes the thermomechanical memory of preceding cycles of the direct-reverse transformation. It is also found that nonhydrostatic compressive internal stresses promote melting in contrast to hydrostatic pressure. Sixteen theoretical predictions are in qualitative and quantitative agreement with experiments conducted on the PTs in the energetic crystal HMX. In particular, (a) the energy of internal stresses is sufficient to reduce the melting temperature from 551 to 430 K for the delta phase during the beta --> delta PT and from 520 to 400 K for the beta phase during the delta --> beta PT; (b) predicted activation energies for direct and reverse PTs coincide with corresponding melting energies of the beta and delta phases and with the experimental values; (c) the temperature dependence of the rate constant is determined by the heat of fusion, for both direct and reverse PTs; results b and c are obtained both for overall kinetics and for interface propagation; (d) considerable nanocracking, homogeneously distributed in the transformed material, accompanies the PT, as predicted by theory; (e) the nanocracking does not change the PT thermodynamics or kinetics appreciably for the first and the second PT beta <--> delta cycles, as predicted by theory; (f) beta <--> delta PTs start at a very small driving force (in contrast to all known solid-solid transformations with large transformation strain), that is, elastic energy and athermal interface friction must be negligible; (g) beta --> alpha and alpha --> beta PTs, which are thermodynamically possible in the temperature range 382.4 < theta < 430 K and below 382.4 K, respectively, do not occur.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Phase Transitions: Melting and Freezing
Phase Changes
A substance melts or freezes at a temperature called its melting point and boils or condenses at its boiling point. These temperatures depend on pressure. High pressure favors the denser form of the substance, so typically, high pressure...
Phase Transitions
Crystal Growth: Principles of Crystallization
Initiating crystallization involves manipulating the concentration of the solute and the temperature of the solution. Since crystal growth occurs when the ratio of concentration and solubility of the solute in the solvent – the...
Phase Transitions: Sublimation and Deposition
Solid–Solid Solutions

