Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Methodological issues in comparing injury incidence across countries.

R A Lyons1, S Polinder, C F Larsen

  • 1Centre for Health Improvement through Research and Evaluation (CHIRAL, The School of Medicine, University of Wales Swansea, UK. r.a.lyons@swansea.ac.uk

International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion
|May 19, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Improving the recognition of child maltreatment in emergency departments in Europe: healthcare professionals' perceived barriers and facilitators for implementation of a comprehensive toolkit design.

European journal of pediatrics·2026
Same author

Correction to: Nonoperative versus operative management of frail institutionalized older patients with a proximal femoral fracture: a cost-utility analysis alongside a multicenter prospective cohort study.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2025
Same author

Evaluation of the UK's COVID-19 public health policy "Shielding: Results of a linked data matched cohort study.

Public health·2025
Same author

Correction to: Nonoperative versus operative management of frail institutionalized older patients with a proximal femoral fracture: a cost-utility analysis alongside a multicenter prospective cohort study.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2025
Same author

Work participation, social roles, and empowerment of Q-fever fatigue syndrome patients ≥10 years after infection.

PloS one·2024
Same author

Tachyphylaxis and reproducibility of desmopressin response in perioperative persons with nonsevere hemophilia A: implications for clinical practice.

Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis·2024

Comparing injury incidence across countries presents challenges. This study developed methods for more accurate international injury surveillance data comparison, focusing on fractures.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Epidemiology
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • International comparison of injury incidence is crucial for public health.
  • Existing injury surveillance systems lack standardized methodologies, hindering cross-national data analysis.
  • Variations in data collection and reporting impede accurate comparisons of injury burdens.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and describe methodological challenges in comparing international injury incidence data.
  • To propose and develop solutions for more accurate cross-national injury surveillance.
  • To enhance the comparability of injury data across different countries.

Main Methods:

  • A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining expert consultation with data analysis.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Injury surveillance systems and data from ten European countries were compared.
  • A specific methodology for selecting radiologically verifiable fractures and assessing data representativeness was developed.

    • Main Results:

    • Methodological challenges in comparing injury incidence across countries were identified.
    • A novel approach for selecting verifiable fracture subsets was devised.
    • A method to evaluate the national representativeness of emergency department data was proposed.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed methods offer potential solutions for comparing injury incidence internationally.
    • Further refinement and testing of these tools are recommended for robust cross-national injury surveillance.
    • These advancements are expected to aid researchers and policymakers in comparative injury research.