Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026

Diagnosis of Hirschsprung's Disease by Immunostaining Rectal Suction Biopsies for Calretinin, S100 Protein and Protein Gene Product 9.5
Published on: April 26, 2019
Diagnostic tests in Hirschsprung disease: a systematic review
F de Lorijn1, L C M Kremer, J B Reitsma
1Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. f.delorigin@amc.uva.nl
Insights
Rectal suction biopsy (RSB) and anorectal manometry (ARM) are the most accurate diagnostic tests for Hirschsprung disease in infants. Contrast enema (CE) showed significantly lower accuracy in this systematic review.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Surgery
- Gastroenterology
- Diagnostic Imaging
Background:
- Hirschsprung disease is a congenital condition affecting the large intestine.
- Accurate diagnosis in infants is crucial for timely intervention.
- Various diagnostic tests exist, including contrast enema (CE), anorectal manometry (ARM), and rectal suction biopsy (RSB).
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and compare the diagnostic accuracy of CE, ARM, and RSB in infants suspected of Hirschsprung disease.
- To identify the most reliable diagnostic tool for this condition.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of published studies.
- Inclusion of studies with infants undergoing CE, ARM, or RSB, with biopsy or clinical follow-up as reference standard.
- Data extraction for 2x2 tables to calculate sensitivity and specificity.
Main Results:
- Rectal suction biopsy (RSB) demonstrated the highest accuracy, with a mean sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 98%.
- Anorectal manometry (ARM) showed comparable accuracy to RSB (sensitivity 91%, specificity 94%).
- Contrast enema (CE) had significantly lower diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity 70%, specificity 83%).
Conclusions:
- RSB and ARM are the most accurate tests for diagnosing Hirschsprung disease in infants.
- These methods should be prioritized in the diagnostic workup.
Objective:
We conducted a systematic review to determine and compare the diagnostic accuracy of contrast enema (CE), anorectal manometry (ARM) and rectal suction biopsy (RSB) in infants suspected of Hirschsprung disease.
Design:
This is a systematic review.
Data Sources:
Articles were identified through electronic searches in Medline, EMBASE.com and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. Searches were limited to articles published after 1966 in PubMed and after 1980 in EMBASE.com.
Study Selection:
Studies were included if infants underwent at least one of the following tests: CE, ARM or RSB, followed by full-thickness biopsy and/or clinical follow-up as the reference standard.
Data Extraction:
Two reviewers independently assessed the methods of data collection, patient selection, blinding and prevention of verification bias and description of the test protocol and reference standard. Data to construct 2 x 2 tables were abstracted for each test.
Results:
Twenty-four studies met our inclusion criteria, but 2 studies were subsequently excluded for statistical analysis because data was missing to construct the 2 x 2 table. RSB (14 studies for a total of 993 patients) was the most accurate test, having both the highest mean sensitivity (93%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 88%-95%) and mean specificity (98%; 95% CI, 95%-99%). Sensitivity and specificity of ARM (9 studies for a total of 400 patients) were similar to those of RSB (91% vs 93%, P = 0.73 and 94% vs 98%, P = 0.08, respectively). Sensitivity and specificity of CE (12 studies for a total of 425 patients) were significantly lower than those of RSB and ARM, with mean sensitivity and mean specificity of 70% and 83%, respectively.
Conclusions:
RSB and ARM are the most accurate tests in the diagnostic workup of Hirschsprung disease.
Related Concept Videos
Serum Laboratory Studies, Stool Test, Breath Test
Inflammatory Bowel Disease III: Diagnostic Studies and Management I-Nutritional Therapy
Diagnostic studies
A colonoscopy is the definitive screening test, distinguishing ulcerative colitis from other colon diseases with similar symptoms. During a colonoscopy test, inflamed mucosa with exudate ulcerations can be observed, and biopsies are taken to determine the histologic characteristics of the colonic...
Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy
Radionuclide Testing
Radionuclide testing is a sophisticated medical technique for assessing gastrointestinal motility. It focuses on gastric emptying and colonic transit time. Radioactive markers track the movement of food through the digestive system, providing insights into gastrointestinal disorders.
In gastric emptying studies, a meal's liquid and solid...
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
Irritable Bowel Syndrome II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Evaluation
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is classified into subtypes based on the predominant bowel habits as determined by the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS). The subtypes are: