Amifostine and glutathione prevent ifosfamide- and acrolein-induced hemorrhagic cystitis
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026

Induction of Nephrotic Syndrome in Mice by Retrobulbar Injection of Doxorubicin and Prevention of Volume Retention by Sustained Release Aprotinin
Published on: May 6, 2018
C K L P Batista1, J M S C Mota, M L P Souza
1Departamento de Fisiologia e Farmacologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Rua Coronel Nunes de Melo, 1127, Rodolfo Teófilo, 60430-270, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Introduction:
Ifosfamide (IFS) is an antineoplastic alkylating agent whose major side effect is hemorrhagic cystitis (HC). This toxicity is attributed to the renal excretion of acrolein (ACR), a highly urotoxic IFS metabolite. Despite the clinical use of mesna to prevent HC, a significant percent ( approximately 33%) of patients present with at last one feature of HC, mainly hematuria.
Aim:
To investigate the use of two antioxidants-amifostine and glutathione-for the prevention of experimental IFS- and ACR-induced HC.
Materials And Methods:
Male Swiss mice were treated intraperitoneal (i.p.) with saline (control), glutathione (125, 250 or 500 mg/kg) or amifostine (25, 50 or 100 mg/kg), and 30 min later they received a single i.p. injection of IFS at a dose of 400 mg/kg. To investigate the systemic effects of the antioxidants on ACR-induced HC, the animals were treated with saline, amifostine (50 mg/kg, i.p.) or glutathione (500 mg/kg, i.p.), and 30 min afterward with 75 mug ACR intravesically (i.ve.). In another set of experiments, the antioxidants were injected directly into the bladder, where the mice received a single i.ve injection of ACR (75 mug) plus amifostine (1.5 mg/kg) or glutathione (2 mg/kg). HC was measured 3 h after IFS or ACR injection according to bladder wet weight, macroscopic (edema and hemorrhage) and microscopic changes, i.e., edema, hemorrhage, cellular infiltration, fibrin deposition and urothelial desquamation.
Results:
Pretreatments with amifostine or glutathione prevented IFS-induced HC in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, ACR-induced HC was also prevented by systemic (i.p.) or local (i.ve.) pretreatment with glutathione or amifostine. The greatest protective effect was seen with local amifostine treatment (2 mg/kg i.ve.) (P < 0.05).
Conclusions:
Glutathione and amifostine show a beneficial effect in experimental IFS- and ACR-induced HC. Thus, they should be investigated as an alternative treatment to prevent HC observed in patients undergoing IFS treatment.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Drugs for Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis in IBD
Drugs that Stabilize Microtubules
Antiprotozoal Agents
Drugs for Treatment of Constipation-Predominant IBS