Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Analyzing trends in brain interface technology: a method to compare studies.

M M Moore Jackson1, S G Mason, G E Birch

  • 1College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. mooremelody@bellsouth.net

Annals of Biomedical Engineering
|May 19, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Online removal of eye movement and blink EEG artifacts using a high-speed eye tracker.

IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering·2011
Same author

A self-paced brain-computer interface system with a low false positive rate.

Journal of neural engineering·2008
Same author

An automatic method to generate ensemble averages of movement-related potentials for individuals with spinal cord injuries.

Conference proceedings : ... Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual Conference·2007
Same author

A comprehensive survey of brain interface technology designs.

Annals of biomedical engineering·2006
Same author

A general framework for characterizing studies of brain interface technology.

Annals of biomedical engineering·2005
Same author

A brain-controlled switch for asynchronous control applications.

IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering·2000
Same journal

Numerical Study of Human Torso Mechanical Response and Injury Assessment Under Blast Loading with Bulletproof Protection.

Annals of biomedical engineering·2026
Same journal

Immediate and Mid-Long-Term Effects of Foot Orthoses on Gait Biomechanics and Clinical Characteristics in Medial Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Annals of biomedical engineering·2026
Same journal

Screening and Evaluation of Post-stroke Dysphagia: Insights from Neurology, Artificial Intelligence and Data Science-A Scoping Review.

Annals of biomedical engineering·2026
Same journal

Assessing the Efficacy of GameBreaker Softshell Headgear in Reducing Peak Head Kinematics.

Annals of biomedical engineering·2026
Same journal

Reference Standards, Numerical Consistency, and Scoring Logic: Pre-deployment Assurance Considerations for AI-Assisted Third Molar Extraction Planning : Regarding: Ko J, Sooksatra S, Kim S, Tang S, Ha JE, Han DH, Lee KH, Jung YJ, Kim MJ. Quantitative assessment of third molar extraction difficulty and nerve injury risk using artificial intelligence and image processing. Ann Biomed Eng. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-026-04114-9.

Annals of biomedical engineering·2026
Same journal

Un-AI-ing: Compliance, Evasion, and the Distortion of Research Writing in the Age of AI Detection.

Annals of biomedical engineering·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces a new method for comparing Brain Interface (BI) research studies. The approach enables objective evaluation of BI technologies and identifies trends in the rapidly growing field.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Computer Science

Background:

  • The Brain Interface (BI) field has seen significant growth over the past two decades.
  • Increasing numbers of researchers and organizations are developing advanced BI technologies.
  • The diversity within the BI field has made objective comparison of studies challenging.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel method for directly comparing studies of Brain Interface (BI) technology.
  • To establish objective comparison criteria based on established theoretical models and taxonomy.
  • To address the need for standardized evaluation in the expanding BI research community.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a new comparative method for BI studies.
  • Utilized theoretical models and taxonomy proposed by Mason, Moore, and Birch.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Applied the method to interpret and compare a set of 21 diverse BI studies.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed method effectively identifies key aspects of individual BI studies.
    • It highlights reported and omitted information within study data.
    • Facilitates objective comparisons between different BI research efforts.
    • Characterizes overall trends, research gaps, and reporting patterns in the BI field.

    Conclusions:

    • The new method provides a framework for objective and comprehensive comparison of BI studies.
    • It aids in understanding the landscape of BI research, including trends and areas needing further investigation.
    • This approach supports the advancement of standardized evaluation practices within the Brain Interface community.