Related Experiment Videos
Microtensile bond strengths of composite to dentin treated with desensitizer products
Ana Cecília Corrêa Aranha1, Adonis De Santi Siqueira Junior, Larissa Maria Assad Cavalcante
1Department of Dentistry, Special Laboratory of Lasers in Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Brazil. acca@usp.br
Purpose:
This study was designed to analyze the influence of desensitizing procedures on dentin bond strength.
Materials And Methods:
Forty bovine incisors were used, divided into four groups (n = 10): G1: control; G2: Gluma Desensitizer (Heraeus Kulzer); G3: Oxa-Gel (Art-Dent); G4: low-intensity laser (MMOptics). The buccal surface was wet ground flat with 180-, 400- and 600-grit silicon carbide abrasive paper to expose midcoronal dentin and create a uniform surface. After the application of the desensitizing agents to the exposed dentin, the specimens were etched with 35% phosphoric acid for 30 s, and an adhesive (Single Bond) was applied and light cured. A 4-mm high crown of composite resin (Filtek Z250) was then built up. Specimens were trimmed to an hourglass shape with cross sections of 1 mm2. Each specimen was individually fractured by a microtensile testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The data, recorded in MPa, were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and the Duncan test (p = 0.05).
Results:
Specimens treated with dentin desensitizers (except Gluma) yielded significantly lower mean bond strengths than nontreated control specimens. The mean values in MPa (+/- SD) were: G1: 13.4 (6.2); G2: 13.2 (4.8); G3: 7.15 (4.3); G4: 7.21 (4.6).
Conclusions:
Among the desensitizing agents studied, only Gluma Desensitizer did not detrimentally influence the bond strength values. It is a useful material for dentin desensitization.
Related Concept Videos
Bonding and Strength of Aggregate
Tensile Strength Considerations of Concrete
The dimensions and shape of a concrete specimen also...