Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Multiple-imputation for measurement-error correction.

Stephen R Cole1, Haitao Chu, Sander Greenland

  • 1Department of Epidemiology, 615 Norht Wolfe Street, E7640, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. scole@jhsph.edu

International Journal of Epidemiology
|May 20, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Toward Evidence Synthesis of Adverse Events in Imbalanced Time-to-Event Data.

Journal of evidence-based medicine·2026
Same author

Gut microbial bile salt hydrolase as a metabolic gatekeeper in digestive homeostasis and disease.

Frontiers in immunology·2026
Same author

Trial-design-aware funnel plot for publication bias assessment with non-inferiority or equivalence objectives.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same author

Comparative effectiveness of alternative times to opioid agonist treatment taper initiation on taper completion and all-cause mortality among people with opioid use disorder: A retrospective population-based target trial emulation study in British Columbia, Canada, 2010-2020.

Addiction (Abingdon, England)·2026
Same author

Negatives about positivity and consistency as conditions for causal inference.

American journal of epidemiology·2026
Same author

Unpublished trials affected evidence synthesis substantially when estimating medication harms in children.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Ambient air pollution and risk of active tuberculosis: a population-based cohort study in Taiwan.

International journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Dental amalgam, chronic disease risk, and removing mercury from dental practice.

International journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Age at menarche and adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes: triangulating evidence from multivariable and Mendelian randomization analyses.

International journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Life-course trajectories of cardiovascular disease risk factors in rural India: Andhra Pradesh Children and Parents Study (APCAPS) 2003-2023.

International journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Cohort Profile Update: The Young Lives study.

International journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

From the departing Editors in Chief.

International journal of epidemiology·2026
See all related articles

Measurement error correction methods are underutilized. Multiple Imputation for Measurement Error (MIME) offers a viable solution, demonstrating effectiveness in simulation studies for epidemiological data analysis.

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Measurement error is prevalent in epidemiological studies but often unaddressed.
  • Existing measurement error correction methods are underutilized.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of Multiple Imputation for Measurement Error (MIME) correction.
  • To compare MIME with other methods like regression calibration (RC) and complete case analysis.

Main Methods:

  • MIME was treated as a missing-data problem and implemented using SAS software.
  • A simulation experiment was conducted using hypothetical data from a chronic kidney disease cohort study.
  • Monte Carlo simulations were performed across eight scenarios to assess performance.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • MIME correction yielded a hazard ratio comparable to complete data (2.0 vs. 2.0) and regression calibration (2.0 vs. 2.0).
  • MIME demonstrated approximate unbiasedness, correct coverage, and sometimes greater power than misclassified or RC analyses.
  • However, MIME's bias correction could be offset by increased imprecision, depending on sample size and validation proportion.

Conclusions:

  • The choice between MIME and regression calibration depends on specific study objectives, performance, and ease of implementation.
  • MIME correction's utility is influenced by sample size and the proportion of validated data.
  • MIME can be a valuable tool for interpreting epidemiological data with imperfect measurements.