Related Experiment Videos
[Clinical relevance of study results]
1Divisione di Nefrologia e Dialisi, Azienda Istituti Ospitalieri di Cremona, Italy. p.ravani@ospedale.cremona.it
Abstract:
The critical appraisal process of available evidence includes the evaluation of clinical importance of the study findings. This should coincide with the minimum worthwhile effect expected by the investigators in the study design and planning. In hard outcome studies it can be quantified by the absolute risk difference between groups and its reciprocal, known as number needed to treat to avoid one adverse event, or benefit (NNTB). The number needed to treat to produce harmful consequences of treatment (NNTH) should also be taken into account. Finally these effect measures, like risks and incidence proportions, are usually rough estimates of the true effects, due to non-complete follow-up of the observations under study. Underlying assumptions and design issues are especially important to assess the clinical relevance of any results.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Toxicity Testing in Animals
Clinical Trials: Overview
Mouse Models of Cancer Study
The development of transgenic, knockout, and knock-in mice has led to an exponential increase in their use as model organisms in research,...