Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Minimizing medical litigation, part 2.

Tan Keng Boon Harold1

  • 1Manpower Standards and Development Division, Ministry of Health, Singapore. Harold_tan@moh.gov.sg

The Journal of Medical Practice Management : MPM
|May 23, 2006
PubMed
Summary

Provider-patient disputes are common. Implementing early alternative dispute resolution (ADR), including communication and mediation, can improve malpractice claim resolution, moving beyond traditional negotiation and litigation.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Minimizing medical litigation, Part 1.

The Journal of medical practice management : MPMยท2006
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Management
  • Medical Law
  • Conflict Resolution

Background:

  • Provider-patient disputes are an inherent challenge within the healthcare system.
  • Current dispute resolution often relies on negotiation, frequently escalating to litigation.
  • The utilization of mediation in malpractice cases remains limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the inevitability of healthcare disputes and advocate for proactive resolution strategies.
  • To emphasize the need for integrating alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods early in patient care.
  • To propose a national strategy for resolving malpractice disputes.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of current dispute resolution practices in healthcare.
  • Review of the role and effectiveness of negotiation, litigation, and mediation.
  • Conceptualization of a post-event communication-cum-mediation framework.

Main Results:

  • Negotiation is the primary method, often leading to litigation when unsuccessful.
  • Mediation has played a minimal role in resolving malpractice disputes.
  • A significant gap exists in effective, early-stage dispute resolution mechanisms.

Conclusions:

  • Healthcare providers and regulators must acknowledge and plan for disputes.
  • Early intervention through ADR, particularly communication and mediation, is crucial.
  • A national strategy centered on a post-event communication-cum-mediation framework is recommended for malpractice disputes.

Related Experiment Videos