Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
Published on: May 9, 2025
Ligand bias of scoring functions in structure-based virtual screening
Micael Jacobsson1, Anders Karlén
1Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Uppsala, Box 574, SE-751 23 Uppsala, Sweden. micael.jacobsson@biovitrum.com
Postprocessing scoring functions using partial least squares (PLS) MASC improved virtual screening enrichment by reducing ligand bias. Normalization methods, particularly those considering molecular weight, also enhanced performance.
Area of Science:
- Computational chemistry
- Drug discovery
Background:
- Structure-based virtual screening (SBVS) relies on scoring functions to predict ligand-target binding.
- Scoring functions can exhibit ligand bias, leading to false positives and reduced screening efficiency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate postprocessing methods for improving enrichment factors in virtual screening.
- To investigate the effectiveness of multiple active site correction (MASC) and partial least squares (PLS) MASC in mitigating ligand bias.
Main Methods:
- Docking of known actives and decoy compounds to eight targets using 10 scoring functions.
- Application of multiple active site correction (MASC), PLS MASC, and size normalization techniques.
- Analysis of enrichment factors and correlation between scores and molecular descriptors.
Main Results:
- Standard MASC did not consistently improve enrichment.
- Unit variance normalization and PLS MASC showed significant performance improvements.
- PLS MASC was more effective when scoring functions exhibited size dependence.
- Normalization by molecular weight or heavy atom count, especially with root transformations, enhanced enrichment.
Conclusions:
- Ligand bias in scoring functions is a significant source of false positives in SBVS.
- PLS MASC and specific normalization strategies can effectively reduce false positives and improve virtual screening performance.
More Related Videos
10:01Structure-Guided Design and Development of Novel Cyclophilin A Inhibitors and Ganoderiol-F Derivatives: An In-Silico Approach
Published on: June 23, 2026
14:34A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English
Published on: April 3, 2026
Related Concept Videos
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength
Ligand Binding Sites
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Ligand Binding Sites
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally analyses the...
Ligand Binding and Linkage
Ligand Binding and Linkage