Domain chaos puzzle and the calculation of the structure factor and its half-width
Nathan Becker1, Guenter Ahlers
1Department of Physics and iQCD, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA. nbecker@physics.ucsb.edu
Abstract:
The disagreement of the scaling of the correlation length xi between experiment and the Ginzburg-Landau (GL) model for domain chaos was resolved. The Swift-Hohenberg (SH) domain chaos model was integrated numerically to acquire test images to study the effect of a finite image size on the extraction of from the structure factor (SF). The finite image size had a significant effect on the SF determined with the Fourier-transform (FT) method. The maximum entropy method (MEM) was able to overcome this finite image-size problem and produced fairly accurate SFs for the relatively small image sizes provided by experiments. Correlation lengths often have been determined from the second moment of the SF of chaotic patterns because the functional form of the SF is not known. Integration of several test functions provided analytic results indicating that this may not be a reliable method of extracting xi. For both a Gaussian and a squared SH form, the correlation length xi[triple bond]1/sigma, determined from the variance sigma2 of the SF, has the same dependence on the control parameter epsilon as the length xi contained explicitly in the functional forms. However, for the SH and the Lorentzian forms we find xi approximately xi (1/2). Results for xi determined from new experimental data by fitting the functional forms directly to the experimental SF yielded xi approximately epsilon(-v) with v approximately equal to 1/4 for all four functions in the case of the FT method, but v approximately equal to 1/2, in agreement with the GL prediction, in the case of the MEM. Over a wide range of epsilon and wave number k, the experimental SFs collapsed onto a unique curve when appropriately scaled by xi.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Determination of Crystal Structures
Method of Sections: Problem Solving I
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
Indeterminate Structure
Method of Joints: Problem Solving II


