Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Sequence comparison and protein structure prediction.

Roland L Dunbrack1

  • 1Institute for Cancer Research, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA. roland.dunbrack@fccc.edu

Current Opinion in Structural Biology
|May 23, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Defining active conformations from substrate-bound structures enables active-state AlphaFold2 modeling of all 437 human catalytic protein kinase domains.

The Biochemical journal·2026
Same author

Structural mechanism for noncanonical GPCR signaling in the Hedgehog pathway.

Nature structural & molecular biology·2026
Same author

Defining the Active Conformation of Typical Protein Kinase Domains from Substrate-Bound PDB Structures Enables Active-State AlphaFold2 Models for All 437 Human Catalytic Protein Kinases.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Structure-guided analysis and prediction of human E2-E3 ligase pairing specificity.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

<i>Rēs</i> <math><mtext>ipSAE</mtext></math> <i>loquunt</i>: What's wrong with AlphaFold's <math><mtext>ipTM</mtext></math> score and how to fix it.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Queer voices in computational biology: the first ISCB LGBTQI+ Symposium.

Bioinformatics advances·2025
Same journal

Metabolic disruptions through a three-dimensional genomic lens.

Current opinion in structural biology·2026
Same journal

Collective variable design for biomolecular conformational dynamics.

Current opinion in structural biology·2026
Same journal

Polymer scaling in protein crowding: From dilute coils to semidilute meshes.

Current opinion in structural biology·2026
Same journal

Tuning the physicochemical properties of rationally designed protein-based biomolecular condensates.

Current opinion in structural biology·2026
Same journal

Editorial overview: Folding, binding and protein design.

Current opinion in structural biology·2026
Same journal

Macromolecular crowding reshapes the conformational landscapes of intrinsically disordered proteins: mechanisms, cellular contexts, and functional consequences.

Current opinion in structural biology·2026
See all related articles

Predicting protein structure relies on sequence comparison to find related proteins. Advanced methods integrate diverse data, including profiles, secondary structures, and consensus approaches, to improve remote homologue identification and alignment.

Area of Science:

  • Computational biology
  • Structural bioinformatics
  • Protein science

Background:

  • Protein structure prediction is crucial for understanding protein function.
  • Identifying remote homologues and aligning sequences accurately remain significant challenges.
  • Existing methods often struggle with distant relationships and alignment ambiguities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review recent advances in protein sequence comparison for structure prediction.
  • To highlight strategies for identifying and aligning remote protein homologues.
  • To discuss emerging technologies and future directions in the field.

Main Methods:

  • Integrating diverse data sources: amino acid variation (profiles, Hidden Markov Models), secondary structures, and biological data.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Combining sequence and structure alignment strategies based on homology.
  • Utilizing machine learning (e.g., support vector machines) and consensus approaches from multiple fold recognition methods.

    • Main Results:

    • Multi-source information integration enhances the accuracy of remote homologue identification and alignment.
    • Consensus strategies combining various fold recognition methods are highly effective.
    • Support vector machines and Hidden Markov Model alignment show promise for fold classification and alignment.

    Conclusions:

    • Advanced sequence comparison techniques significantly improve protein structure prediction.
    • Integrating diverse data and employing consensus methods are key to overcoming current challenges.
    • Future progress may involve refinement methods that handle structural variations and alignment errors.